Trial reportBone marrow transplantation2008
Prospective single-arm study of pegfilgrastim activity and safety in children with poor-risk malignant tumours receiving chemotherapy.
Trial report in Bone marrow transplantation, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.
- An open-label, randomized study comparing lipegfilgrastim with filgrastim in pediatric patients receiving chemotherapy for Ewing sarcoma or rhabdomyosarcoma.Scientific reports · 2025Trial
- Trial
- Phase II, randomized, open-label study of pegfilgrastim-supported VDC/IE chemotherapy in pediatric sarcoma patients.Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology · 2010Trial
- Hematopoietic progenitor cell mobilization and harvesting in children with malignancies: do the advantages of pegfilgrastim really translate into clinical benefit?Bone marrow transplantation · 2009Trial
- Peripheral blood stem cell mobilization with pegylated granulocyte colony stimulating factor in children.Cancer reports (Hoboken, N.J.) · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The objective of this study was to assess the efficacy of an injection of 100 microg/kg of pegfilgrastim in haematopoietic recovery and mobilization in children following 32 courses of chemotherapy. End points were duration of neutropaenia, myeloid recovery and PBMC collection. Neutropaenia lasted a mean of 4.7 days (+/-2.13 days). Myeloid recovery occurred at a median of 10 days (inter quartile range (IQR) 8-11). Febrile neutropaenia complicated 13 courses (40.6%). Mobilization was observed in 20 out of 26 assessable courses (76.9%). The rise in CD34+ cells occurred at a median of 6 days (IQR 4-7) after PEG and remained >20 per microl for 6 days (IQR 4-8), with a median value of 80 per microl (IQR 48-170.5). The median CD34+ cell peak was 165 per microl (IQR 82.5-331), 9 days (range 6-14) after PEG. PBMC were collected on average at day +5 (+4 to +9) after PEG. In 93.3% of collections, at least 3 x 10(6) per kg CD34+ cells were collected through a single apheresis. Myeloid recovery occurred in all cases within 15 days, without concomitant thrombocytopaenia. The incidence of primary febrile episodes is in line with data in the literature and with our own historical experience. A long-lasting period of circulating CD34+ cells allowed for more accurate scheduling of apheresis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.