Evidence map›Paper›PMID 18641138›Full record

ArticleJournal of bacteriology2008

Genomic island 2 of Brucella melitensis is a major virulence determinant: functional analyses of genomic islands.

Gireesh Rajashekara, Jill Covert, Erik Petersen, Linda Eskra, Gary Splitter

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of bacteriology, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
3.9field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 32 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. When the Going Gets Rough: The Significance ofFrontiers in microbiology · 2021
    Review
  3. Article
  4. WadD, a NewFrontiers in microbiology · 2018
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Smooth to Rough Dissociation in Brucella: The Missing Link to Virulence.Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2015
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Gireesh RajashekaraFood Animal Health Research Program, Ohio Agricultural Research Development Center, Department of Veterinary Preventive Medicine, The Ohio State University, Wooster, OH 44691, USA. rajashekara.2@osu.edu
Jill Covert
Erik Petersen
Linda Eskra
Gary Splitter
University of Wisconsin–Madison · USThe Ohio State University · US

Funding

Vaccines and Therapies Against BotulismU54AI057153 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO · PI KANABROCKI, JOSEPH A. · 2003 to 2013
$87.6M
Brucella epitope recognition by CD8+ T cellsR01AI073558 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON · PI HARMS, JEROME SCOTT, SMITH, JUDITH ANNE · 2008 to 2016
$3.3M
Genomic Island-5 in Brucella PathogenesisR21AI070229 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON · PI SPLITTER, GARY A · 2006 to 2007
$397k
NIAID NIH HHS 1-U54-AI-057153NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI073558NIAID NIH HHS R01-AI-073558NIAID NIH HHS R21 AI070229NIAID NIH HHS R21-AI-070229NIAID NIH HHS U54 AI057153
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Brucella genomic islands (GIs) share similarities in their genomic organization to pathogenicity islands from other bacteria and are likely acquired by lateral gene transfer. Here, we report the identification of a GI that is important for the pathogenicity of Brucella melitensis. The deletion of GI-1, GI-5, or GI-6 did not affect bacterial growth in macrophages as well as their virulence in interferon regulatory factor 1-deficient (IRF-1(-/-)) mice, suggesting that these islands do not contribute to Brucella virulence. However, the deletion of GI-2 resulted in the attenuation of bacterial growth in macrophages and virulence in IRF-1(-/-) mice. The GI-2 mutant also displayed a rough lipopolysaccharide (LPS) phenotype indicated by acriflavin agglutination, suggesting that in vitro and in vivo attenuation is a result of LPS alteration. Further, systematic analysis of the entire GI-2 revealed two open reading frames (ORFs), BMEI0997 and I0998, that encode hypothetical sugar transferases and contribute to LPS alteration, as the deletion of either of these ORFs resulted in a rough phenotype similar to that of the GI-2 mutant. Complementation analyses indicated that in addition to I0997 and I0998, I0999 is required to restore the smooth LPS in the GI-2 mutant as well as its full in vitro and in vivo virulence. The I0999 sequence analysis suggested that it might function as a transporter to help facilitate the transport or linking of the O antigen to the LPS. Our study also indicated that the rough LPS resulting from the GI-2 deletion may affect pathogen-associated molecular pattern recognition by Toll-like receptors.

Indexed as

Genomic IslandsAnimalsBacterial Outer Membrane ProteinsBacterial ProteinsBrucella melitensisBrucellosisCell LineFemaleGenome, BacterialHumansLipopolysaccharidesMacrophagesMaleMiceMice, Inbred C57BLMice, KnockoutBacterial Outer Membrane ProteinsBacterial ProteinsLipopolysaccharidesTLR protein, bacteriaVirulence Factors

Identifiers

PMID18641138
PMCPMC2546784
OpenAlexW2111763289

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.