Evidence map›Paper›PMID 18640574›Full record

Trial reportBiology of blood and marrow transplantation : journal of the American Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation2008

Second autologous stem cell transplantation for relapsed lymphoma after a prior autologous transplant.

Sonali M Smith, Koen van Besien, Jeanette Carreras, Asad Bashey, Mitchell S Cairo, Cesar O Freytes, Robert Peter Gale, Gregory A Hale, Brandon Hayes-Lattin, Leona A Holmberg and 11 more

Abstract readClinical Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Biology of blood and marrow transplantation : journal of the American Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Outcome of lower-intensity allogeneic transplantation in non-Hodgkin lymphoma after autologous transplantation failure.Biology of blood and marrow transplantation : journal of the American Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation · 2012
    Article
  14. Role of hematopoietic stem cell transplantation in relapsed/refractory hodgkin lymphoma.Mediterranean journal of hematology and infectious diseases · 2012
    Article
  15. Review
  16. The role of autologous and allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation for Hodgkin lymphoma.Journal of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network : JNCCN · 2011
    Review
  17. Article
  18. The role of autologous transplantation in Hodgkin lymphoma.Current hematologic malignancy reports · 2011
    Review
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

21 authors.

Sonali M SmithDepartment of Medicine, The University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois 60637, USA. smsmith@medicine.bsd.uchicago.edu
Koen van Besien
Jeanette Carreras
Asad Bashey
Mitchell S Cairo
Cesar O Freytes
Robert Peter Gale
Gregory A Hale
Brandon Hayes-Lattin
Leona A Holmberg
Armand Keating
Richard T Maziarz
Philip L McCarthy
Willis H Navarro
Santiago Pavlovsky
Harry C Schouten
Matthew Seftel
Peter H Wiernik
Julie M Vose
Hillard M Lazarus
Parameswaran Hari

Funding

Data Resource for Analyzing Blood &Marrow TransplantsU24CA076518 · NCI · MEDICAL COLLEGE OF WISCONSIN · PI Amy M Moskop, Bronwen Shaw · 1998 to 2026
$105.2M
NCI NIH HHS U24 CA076518NCI NIH HHS U24-CA76518
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We determined treatment-related mortality, progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS) after a second autologous HCT (HCT2) for patients with lymphoma relapse after a prior HCT (HCT1). Outcomes for patients with either Hodgkin lymphoma (HL, n = 21) or non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL, n = 19) receiving HCT2 reported to the Center for International Blood and Marrow Transplant Research (CIBMTR) were analyzed. The median age at HCT2 was 38 years (range: 16-61) and 22 (58%) patients had a Karnofsky performance score <90. HCT2 was performed >1 year after HCT1 in 82%. The probability of treatment-related mortality at day 100 was 11% (95% confidence interval [CI], 3%-22%). The 1-, 3-, and 5-year probabilities of PFS were 50% (95% CI, 34%-66%), 36% (95% CI, 21%-52%), and 30% (95% CI, 16%-46%), respectively. Corresponding probabilities of survival were 65% (95% CI, 50%-79%), 36% (95% CI, 22%-52%), and 30% (95% CI, 17%-46%), respectively. At a median follow-up of 72 months (range: 12-124 months) after HCT2, 29 patients (73%) have died, 18 (62%) secondary to relapsed lymphoma. The outcomes of patients with HL and NHL were similar. In summary, this series represents the largest reported group of patients with relapsed lymphomas undergoing SCT2 following failed SCT1, and with long-term follow-up. Our series suggests that SCT2 is feasible in patients relapsing after prior HCT1, with a lower treatment-related mortality than that reported for allogeneic transplant in this setting. HCT2 should be considered for patients with relapsed HL or NHL after HCT1 without alternative allogeneic stem cell transplant options.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultFeasibility StudiesFemaleHematopoietic Stem Cell TransplantationHodgkin DiseaseHumansLymphomaLymphoma, Non-HodgkinMaleMiddle AgedRecurrenceReoperationSurvival AnalysisTransplantation, Autologous

Identifiers

PMID18640574
PMCPMC3353768

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.