ReviewJournal of biology2008
Genomics technology for assessing soil pollution.
Review in Journal of biology, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 46 citations in OpenAlex.
- Soil Ecotoxicology Needs Robust Biomarkers: A Meta-Analysis Approach to Test the Robustness of Gene Expression-Based Biomarkers for Measuring Chemical Exposure Effects in Soil Invertebrates.Environmental toxicology and chemistry · 2022Pooled it
- An integrative omics approach to unravel toxicity mechanisms of environmental chemicals: effects of a formulated herbicide.Scientific reports · 2018Article
- Development and validation of a custom microarray for global transcriptome profiling of the fungus Aspergillus nidulans.Current genetics · 2016Article
- Evaluation and characterization of anti-estrogenic and anti-androgenic activities in soil samples along the Second Songhua River, China.Environmental monitoring and assessment · 2015Article
- Transcriptome assembly and microarray construction for Enchytraeus crypticus, a model oligochaete to assess stress response mechanisms derived from soil conditions.BMC genomics · 2014Article
- Pyrosequencing-based transcriptomic resources in the pond snail Lymnaea stagnalis, with a focus on genes involved in molecular response to diquat-induced stress.Ecotoxicology (London, England) · 2012Article
- Toxicity of profenofos to the springtail, Folsomia candida, and ammonia-oxidizers in two agricultural soils.Ecotoxicology (London, England) · 2012Article
- Molecular and life-history effects of a natural toxin on herbivorous and non-target soil arthropods.Ecotoxicology (London, England) · 2012Article
- Functional environmental genomics of a municipal landfill soil.Frontiers in genetics · 2012Article
- Article
- Multilevel ecotoxicity assessment of polycyclic musk in the earthworm Eisenia fetida using traditional and molecular endpoints.Ecotoxicology (London, England) · 2011Article
- Transcriptomics reveals extensive inducible biotransformation in the soil-dwelling invertebrate Folsomia candida exposed to phenanthrene.BMC genomics · 2009Article
- Earthworm genomes, genes and proteins: the (re)discovery of Darwin's worms.Proceedings. Biological sciences · 2009Review
- What would you do if you could sequence everything?Nature biotechnology · 2008Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Transcription and metabolite analysis is a powerful way to reveal physiological shifts in response to environmental pollution. Recent studies on earthworms, including one in BMC Biology, show that the type of pollution and its availability for uptake by organisms can differentially affect transcription and metabolism.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.