Evidence map›Paper›PMID 18637516›Full record

ReviewCurrent topics in microbiology and immunology2008

Cytomegalovirus vaccine development.

M R Schleiss

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Current topics in microbiology and immunology, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 38 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
38citing papers in PubMed
27.0field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

38 citing papers in PubMed, 89 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Identification and characterization of human cytomegalovirus-encoded circular RNAs.Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2022
    Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Whither vaccines?The Journal of infection · 2017
    Review
  15. Cytomegalovirus infection in pregnancy.Birth defects research · 2017
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.

M R SchleissDivision of Pediatric Infectious Diseases, Department of Pediatrics, Center for Infectious Diseases and Microbiology Translational Research, University of Minnesota Medical School, 2001 6th Street SE, Minneapolis, MN 55455, USA. schleiss@umn.edu
University of Minnesota Medical Center · US

Funding

Viral Immunomodulation and Rational CMV Vaccine DesignR01HD044864 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA TWIN CITIES · PI GEBALLE, ADAM P., MCVOY, MICHAEL A · 2003 to 2015
$4.5M
VACCINES FOR PREVENTION OF EXPERIMENTAL CONGENITAL CMVR01HD038416 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA TWIN CITIES · PI SCHLEISS, MARK R. · 2000 to 2009
$2.2M
NICHD NIH HHS R01 HD038416NICHD NIH HHS R01 HD044864
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Although infection with human cytomegalovirus (HCMV) is ubiquitous and usually asymptomatic, there are individuals at high risk for serious HCMV disease. These include solid organ and hematopoietic stem cell (HSC) transplant patients, individuals with HIV infection, and the fetus. Since immunity to HCMV ameliorates the severity of disease, there have been efforts made for over 30 years to develop vaccines for use in these high-risk settings. However, in spite of these efforts, no HCMV vaccine appears to be approaching imminent licensure. The reasons for the failure to achieve the goal of a licensed HCMV vaccine are complex, but several key problems stand out. First, the host immune correlates of protective immunity are not yet clear. Secondly, the viral proteins that should be included in a HCMV vaccine are uncertain. Third, clinical trials have largely focused on immunocompromised patients, a population that may not be relevant to the problem of protection of the fetus against congenital infection. Fourth, the ultimate target population for HCMV vaccination remains unclear. Finally, and most importantly, there has been insufficient education about the problem of HCMV infection, particularly among women of child-bearing age and in the lay public. This review considers the strategies that have been explored to date in development of HCMV vaccines, and summarizes both active clinical trials as well as novel technologies that merit future consideration toward the goal of prevention of this significant public health problem.

Indexed as

Biomedical ResearchCytomegalovirus InfectionsCytomegalovirus VaccinesHumansImmunocompromised HostCytomegalovirus Vaccines

Identifiers

PMID18637516
PMCPMC2831992
OpenAlexW1604413850

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.