Evidence map›Paper›PMID 18637178›Full record

ReviewBMC health services research2008

Experiences of abortion: a narrative review of qualitative studies.

Mabel L S Lie, Stephen C Robson, Carl R May

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in BMC health services research, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Abortion Experiences and Perspectives Amongst Migrants and Refugees: A Systematic Review.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2024
    Pooled it
  2. Experiences of UK health-care services for people with Multiple Sclerosis: a systematic narrative review.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2015
    Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. The experiences of men following recurrent miscarriage in an Irish tertiary hospital: A qualitative analysis.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2022
    Article
  12. Continuation of Unintended Pregnancy.The Linacre quarterly · 2019
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Embracing post-fertilisation methods of family planning: a call to action.The journal of family planning and reproductive health care · 2013
    Article
  18. Review
  19. Clients' perceptions of the quality of care in Mexico city's public-sector legal abortion program.International perspectives on sexual and reproductive health · 2011
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Mabel L S LieInstitute of Health and Society, Newcastle University, William Leech Building, Newcastle upon Tyne, NE2 4HH, UK. m.l.s.lie@ncl.ac.uk
Stephen C Robson
Carl R May

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAlthough abortion or termination of pregnancy (TOP) has become an increasingly normalized component of women's health care over the past forty years, insufficient attention has been paid to women's experiences of surgical or medical methods of TOP.

objectiveTo undertake a narrative review of qualitative studies of women's experiences of TOP and their perspectives on surgical or medical methods.

methodsKeyword searches of Medline, CINAHL, ISI, and IBSS databases. Manual searches of other relevant journals and reference lists of primary articles.

resultsQualitative studies (n = 18) on women's experiences of abortion were identified. Analysis of the results of studies reviewed revealed three main themes: experiential factors that promote or inhibit the choice to seek TOP; experiences of TOP; and experiential aspects of the environment in which TOP takes place.

conclusionWomen's choices about TOP are mainly pragmatic ones that are related to negotiating finite personal and family and emotional resources. Women who are well informed and supported in their choices experience good psychosocial outcomes from TOP. Home TOP using mifepristone appears attractive to women who are concerned about professionals' negative attitudes and lack of privacy in formal healthcare settings but also leads to concerns about management and safety.

Indexed as

Abortifacient AgentsAbortion, InducedChoice BehaviorFemaleHumansNarrationProfessional-Patient RelationsQualitative ResearchSocial EnvironmentAbortifacient Agents

Identifiers

PMID18637178
PMCPMC2488341

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.