ArticleLipids2008
An improved method for separating cardiolipin by HPLC.
Article in Lipids, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.
- Differences in Breast Muscle Mitochondrial Respiratory Capacity, Reactive Oxygen Species Generation, and Complex Characteristics between 7-week-old Meat- and Laying-type Chickens.The journal of poultry science · 2020Article
- Damage to mitochondrial complex I during cardiac ischemia reperfusion injury is reduced indirectly by anti-anginal drug ranolazine.Biochimica et biophysica acta · 2012Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
Herein we report an improved method to separate cardiolipin (Ptd(2)Gro) from tissue total lipid extracts using a biphasic solvent system combined with high performance liquid chromatography. This method uses a normal phase silica column and two mobile phases: mobile phase A that was n-hexane:2-propanol (3:2 by vol) and mobile phase B that was n-hexane:2-propanol:water (56.7:37.8:5.5 by vol). The initial solvent conditions were 95% A and 5% B, with a flow rate of 1.5 mL/min. The samples were from non-derivatized aliquots of liver, heart, or brain lipid extracts. The peak corresponding to Ptd(2)Gro appeared at 31 min, was well defined and did not overlap with neighboring peaks. The adjacent peak corresponded to ethanolamine glycerophospholipids and the remaining phospholipids were eluted in a single peak. The identity of the phospholipids separated by this method was verified by thin layer chromatography (TLC) and fatty acid analysis, which confirmed that the Ptd(2)Gro was well resolved from other phospholipids. This method is useful to separate and quantify Ptd(2)Gro from small tissue samples thereby avoiding the variability associated with TLC methods.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.