Evidence map›Paper›PMID 18635557›Full record

ArticleChemical senses2008

Greater superficial petrosal nerve transection in rats does not change unconditioned licking responses to putatively sweet taste stimuli.

Enshe Jiang, Ginger Blonde, Mircea Garcea, Alan C Spector

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Chemical senses, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 24% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Gastric bypass reduces fat intake and preference.American journal of physiology. Regulatory, integrative and comparative physiology · 2011
    Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Behavioral evidence for a glucose polymer taste receptor that is independent of the T1R2+3 heterodimer in a mouse model.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2011
    Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Enshe JiangDepartment of Psychology and Program in Neuroscience, Florida State University, Tallahassee, FL 32306, USA.
Ginger Blonde
Mircea Garcea
Alan C Spector
Taste and Smell Clinic · USUniversity of Florida · US

Funding

FUNCTIONAL ORGANIZATION OF PERIPHERAL GUSTATORY SYSTEMR01DC001628 · NIDCD · UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA · PI SPECTOR, ALAN C · 1994 to 2007
$1.7M
NIDCD NIH HHS R01-DC01628
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The greater superficial petrosal nerve (GSP), innervating taste buds in the palate, is known to be exceptionally responsive to sucrose, especially compared with the responsiveness of the chorda tympani nerve (CT). However, whereas transection of the CT (CTX) alone has little or no effect on unconditioned licking responses to many "sweet" stimuli, the impact of GSP transection (GSPX) alone is equivocal. To further examine the role of the GSP on licking responses to putatively sweet-tasting substances, brief-access taste tests were conducted in nondeprived rats before and after sham surgery (SHAM) or CTX or GSPX. A range of concentrations of sucrose, L-alanine, glycine, and L-serine, with and without 1.0 mM inosine monophosphate (IMP) added, were used. All groups showed significant concentration-dependent increases in licking to all stimuli presurgically and postsurgically. CTX decreased licking responses relative to SHAM rats in the first sucrose test. There was also a group x concentration interaction for L-alanine, but post hoc tests did not reveal its basis. Other than this, there were no significant differences among the surgical groups. Interestingly, rats with GSPX tended to initiate fewer trials than SHAM rats. Overall, after GSPX, the remaining gustatory nerves are apparently sufficient to maintain concentration-dependent licking responses to all stimuli tested here. The disparity between our results and others in the literature where GSPX reduced licking responses to sucrose is possibly related to differences in surgical technique or test trial duration.

Indexed as

AnimalsBehavior, AnimalConditioning, PsychologicalElectrophysiologyMaleRatsRats, Sprague-DawleyStimulation, ChemicalSucroseTasteTongueSucrose

Identifiers

PMID18635557
PMCPMC2720699
OpenAlexW2123799875

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.