Including organizational ethics in policy review processes in healthcare institutions: a view from Canada.

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

1. Identifying and Classifying Tools for Health Policy Ethics Review: A Systematic Search and Review.Health care analysis : HCA : journal of health philosophy and policy · 2021
   Pooled it
2. The crucial role of ethical hospital administration in neurosurgery education.Frontiers in health services · 2022
   Article
3. Philosophy of Healthcare Ethics Practice Statements: Quality Attestation and Beyond.HEC forum : an interdisciplinary journal on hospitals' ethical and legal issues · 2018
   Article
4. [Solutions for the better integration of public health ethical considerations].Canadian journal of public health = Revue canadienne de sante publique · 2014
   Article

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as