Bidirectional changes in the intrinsic excitability of infralimbic neurons reflect a possible regulatory role in the acquisition and extinction of Pavlovian conditioned fear.

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

1. Postnatal day 2 to 11 constitutes a 5-HT-sensitive period impacting adult mPFC function.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2014
   Article
2. Virogenetic and optogenetic mechanisms to define potential therapeutic targets in psychiatric disorders.Neuropharmacology · 2012
   Review
3. Minimal acupuncture is not a valid placebo control in randomised controlled trials of acupuncture: a physiologist's perspective.Chinese medicine · 2009
   Article

Corrections and comments

• Comment on
  Fear conditioning and extinction differentially modify the intrinsic excitability of infralimbic neurons.2008

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as