ArticleBioinformatics (Oxford, England)2008
Automated annotation of Drosophila gene expression patterns using a controlled vocabulary.
Article in Bioinformatics (Oxford, England), 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
16 citing papers in PubMed.
- Deep Model Based Transfer and Multi-Task Learning for Biological Image Analysis.IEEE transactions on big data · 2020Article
- Deep convolutional neural networks for annotating gene expression patterns in the mouse brain.BMC bioinformatics · 2015Article
- Automated identification of cell-type-specific genes in the mouse brain by image computing of expression patterns.BMC bioinformatics · 2014Article
- Automated annotation of developmental stages of Drosophila embryos in images containing spatial patterns of expression.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2014Article
- A mesh generation and machine learning framework for Drosophila gene expression pattern image analysis.BMC bioinformatics · 2013Article
- BIOCAT: a pattern recognition platform for customizable biological image classification and annotation.BMC bioinformatics · 2013Article
- Automated annotation of gene expression image sequences via non-parametric factor analysis and conditional random fields.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2013Article
- Multi-source feature learning for joint analysis of incomplete multiple heterogeneous neuroimaging data.NeuroImage · 2012Article
- Learning sparse representations for fruit-fly gene expression pattern image annotation and retrieval.BMC bioinformatics · 2012Article
- Localizing genes to cerebellar layers by classifying ISH images.PLoS computational biology · 2012Article
- Automatically identifying and annotating mouse embryo gene expression patterns.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2011Article
- Visualization of image data from cells to organisms.Nature methods · 2010Review
- Systematic image-driven analysis of the spatial Drosophila embryonic expression landscape.Molecular systems biology · 2010Article
- Drosophila Gene Expression Pattern Annotation Using Sparse Features and Term-Term Interactions.KDD : proceedings. International Conference on Knowledge Discovery & Data Mining · 2009Article
- A bag-of-words approach for Drosophila gene expression pattern annotation.BMC bioinformatics · 2009Article
- Drosophila Gene Expression Pattern Annotation through Multi-Instance Multi-Label Learning.IJCAI : proceedings of the conference · 2009Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
motivationRegulation of gene expression in space and time directs its localization to a specific subset of cells during development. Systematic determination of the spatiotemporal dynamics of gene expression plays an important role in understanding the regulatory networks driving development. An atlas for the gene expression patterns of fruit fly Drosophila melanogaster has been created by whole-mount in situ hybridization, and it documents the dynamic changes of gene expression pattern during Drosophila embryogenesis. The spatial and temporal patterns of gene expression are integrated by anatomical terms from a controlled vocabulary linking together intermediate tissues developed from one another. Currently, the terms are assigned to patterns manually. However, the number of patterns generated by high-throughput in situ hybridization is rapidly increasing. It is, therefore, tempting to approach this problem by employing computational methods.
resultsIn this article, we present a novel computational framework for annotating gene expression patterns using a controlled vocabulary. In the currently available high-throughput data, annotation terms are assigned to groups of patterns rather than to individual images. We propose to extract invariant features from images, and construct pyramid match kernels to measure the similarity between sets of patterns. To exploit the complementary information conveyed by different features and incorporate the correlation among patterns sharing common structures, we propose efficient convex formulations to integrate the kernels derived from various features. The proposed framework is evaluated by comparing its annotation with that of human curators, and promising performance in terms of F1 score has been reported.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.