Evidence map›Paper›PMID 18632455›Full record

ArticlePhilosophical transactions. Series A, Mathematical, physical, and engineering sciences2008

A new strategy for assessing sensitivities in biochemical models.

Sven Sahle, Pedro Mendes, Stefan Hoops, Ursula Kummer

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Philosophical transactions. Series A, Mathematical, physical, and engineering sciences, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Clinical psychopharmacology and neuroscience : the official scientific journal of the Korean College of Neuropsychopharmacology · 2017
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. A computational model of liver iron metabolism.PLoS computational biology · 2013
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Sven SahleDepartment Modeling of Biological Processes, Institute for Zoology/BIOQUANT, Im Neuenheimer Feld 267, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany.
Pedro Mendes
Stefan Hoops
Ursula Kummer

Funding

COPASI software for modeling and simulation of biochemical networksR01GM080219 · NIGMS · VIRGINIA POLYTECHNIC INST AND ST UNIV · PI HOOPS, STEFAN, MENDES, PEDRO · 2007 to 2019
$5.4M
NIGMS NIH HHS GM080219NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM080219
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

An integral part of any systems biology approach is the modelling and simulation of the respective system under investigation. However, the values of many parameters of the system have often not been determined or are not identifiable due to technical experimental difficulties or other constraints. Sensitivity analysis is often employed to quantify the importance of each of the model's parameters in the behaviour of the system. This approach can also be useful in identifying those parts of the system that are most sensitive with the potential of becoming drug targets. A problem of the commonly used methods of sensitivity analysis is that they constitute local methods meaning that they depend directly on the exact parameter space, which in turn is not known exactly. One way to circumvent this problem is to carry out sensitivity analysis over a wide range of values for all parameters, but this is handicapped by expensive computations when the systems are high dimensional. Another approach is to employ global sensitivity analysis, which in this context is mostly based on random sampling methods. In this paper we present an efficient approach that involves using numerical optimizing methods that search a wide region of parameter space for a given model to determine the maximum and minimum values of its metabolic control coefficients. A relevant example for drug development is presented to demonstrate the strategy using the software COPASI.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsAnimalsBiochemistryComputersDrug DesignDrug Evaluation, PreclinicalGlycolysisHumansModels, GeneticModels, TheoreticalMuscle, SkeletalReproducibility of ResultsSoftwareSystems Biology

Identifiers

PMID18632455
PMCPMC3268210

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.