ArticleBMC structural biology2008
Systematic analysis of the effect of multiple templates on the accuracy of comparative models of protein structure.
Article in BMC structural biology, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed.
- Identification of small molecule ligands for GPR83 that modulate morphine antinociception and reward.Molecular pharmacology · 2026Article
- Correlated conformational dynamics of the human GluN1-GluN2A type N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA) receptor.Journal of molecular modeling · 2021Article
- Comparative modelling studies of fruit bromelain using molecular dynamics simulation.Journal of molecular modeling · 2020Article
- An overview of comparative modelling and resources dedicated to large-scale modelling of genome sequences.Acta crystallographica. Section D, Structural biology · 2017Review
- From local structure to a global framework: recognition of protein folds.Journal of the Royal Society, Interface · 2014Review
- Systematic assessment of accuracy of comparative model of proteins belonging to different structural fold classes.Journal of molecular modeling · 2011Article
- A new clustering of antibody CDR loop conformations.Journal of molecular biology · 2011Article
- Effect of using suboptimal alignments in template-based protein structure prediction.Proteins · 2011Article
- Low-homology protein threading.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2010Article
- Alignment of multiple protein structures based on sequence and structure features.Protein engineering, design & selection : PEDS · 2009Article
- Modern homology modeling of G-protein coupled receptors: which structural template to use?Journal of medicinal chemistry · 2009Article
- Protein structure prediction and model quality assessment.Drug discovery today · 2009Review
- New tips for structure prediction by comparative modeling.Bioinformation · 2009Article
- Theoretical design of a new chimeric protein for the treatment of breast cancer.Research in pharmaceutical sciencesArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundAlthough multiple templates are frequently used in comparative modeling, the effect of inclusion of additional template(s) on model accuracy (when compared to that of corresponding single-template based models) is not clear. To address this, we systematically analyze two-template models, the simplest case of multiple-template modeling. For an existing target-template pair (single-template modeling), a two-template based model of the target sequence is constructed by including an additional template without changing the original alignment to measure the effect of the second template on model accuracy.
resultsEven though in a large number of cases a two-template model showed higher accuracy than the corresponding one-template model, over the entire dataset only a marginal improvement was observed on average, as there were many cases where no change or the reverse change was observed. The increase in accuracy due to the structural complementarity of the templates increases at higher alignment accuracies. The combination of templates showing the highest potential for improvement is that where both templates share similar and low (less than 30%) sequence identity with the target, as well as low sequence identity with each other. The structural similarity between the templates also helps in identifying template combinations having a higher chance of resulting in an improved model.
conclusionInclusion of additional template(s) does not necessarily improve model quality, but there are distinct combinations of the two templates, which can be selected a priori, that tend to show improvement in model quality over the single template model. The benefit derived from the structural complementarity is dependent on the accuracy of the modeling alignment. The study helps to explain the observation that a careful selection of templates together with an accurate target:template alignment are necessary to the benefit from using multiple templates in comparative modeling and provides guidelines to maximize the benefit from using multiple templates. This enables formulation of simple template selection rules to rank targets of a protein family in the context of structural genomics.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.