Evidence map›Paper›PMID 18631402›Full record

ArticleBMC structural biology2008

Systematic analysis of the effect of multiple templates on the accuracy of comparative models of protein structure.

Suvobrata Chakravarty, Sucheta Godbole, Bing Zhang, Seth Berger, Roberto Sanchez

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in BMC structural biology, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. A new clustering of antibody CDR loop conformations.Journal of molecular biology · 2011
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Low-homology protein threading.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2010
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Suvobrata ChakravartyDepartment of Structural and Chemical Biology, Mount Sinai School of Medicine, 1425 Madison Avenue, New York, NY 10029, USA. suvobrata.chakravarty@mssm.edu
Sucheta Godbole
Bing Zhang
Seth Berger
Roberto Sanchez

Funding

STRUCTURE-BASED DESIGN PARADIGM:HIV Tat.PCAF INHIBITORSP01GM066531 · NIGMS · MOUNT SINAI SCHOOL OF MEDICINE OF NYU · PI ZHOU, MING-MING · 2002 to 2008
$6.6M
High-Accuracy Modeling for Remote Homologues of Known StructuresR01GM081713 · NIGMS · ICAHN SCHOOL OF MEDICINE AT MOUNT SINAI · PI SANCHEZ, ROBERTO · 2007 to 2009
$811k
NIGMS NIH HHS 1P01GM066531NIGMS NIH HHS 1R01GM081713NIGMS NIH HHS P01 GM066531NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM081713
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAlthough multiple templates are frequently used in comparative modeling, the effect of inclusion of additional template(s) on model accuracy (when compared to that of corresponding single-template based models) is not clear. To address this, we systematically analyze two-template models, the simplest case of multiple-template modeling. For an existing target-template pair (single-template modeling), a two-template based model of the target sequence is constructed by including an additional template without changing the original alignment to measure the effect of the second template on model accuracy.

resultsEven though in a large number of cases a two-template model showed higher accuracy than the corresponding one-template model, over the entire dataset only a marginal improvement was observed on average, as there were many cases where no change or the reverse change was observed. The increase in accuracy due to the structural complementarity of the templates increases at higher alignment accuracies. The combination of templates showing the highest potential for improvement is that where both templates share similar and low (less than 30%) sequence identity with the target, as well as low sequence identity with each other. The structural similarity between the templates also helps in identifying template combinations having a higher chance of resulting in an improved model.

conclusionInclusion of additional template(s) does not necessarily improve model quality, but there are distinct combinations of the two templates, which can be selected a priori, that tend to show improvement in model quality over the single template model. The benefit derived from the structural complementarity is dependent on the accuracy of the modeling alignment. The study helps to explain the observation that a careful selection of templates together with an accurate target:template alignment are necessary to the benefit from using multiple templates in comparative modeling and provides guidelines to maximize the benefit from using multiple templates. This enables formulation of simple template selection rules to rank targets of a protein family in the context of structural genomics.

Indexed as

Models, MolecularDatabases, ProteinProteinsResearch DesignSequence AlignmentProteins

Identifiers

PMID18631402
PMCPMC2483983

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.