ArticleTrials2008
The TEAM trial: safety and efficacy of endovascular treatment of unruptured intracranial aneurysms in the prevention of aneurysmal hemorrhages: a randomized comparison with indefinite deferral of treatment in 2002 patients followed for 10 years.
Article in Trials, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT00537134 (Safety and Efficacy of Endovascular Treatment of Unruptured Intracranial Aneurysms in the Prevention of Aneurysmal Haemorrhages), which is not on this map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Safety and Efficacy of Endovascular Treatment of Unruptured Intracranial Aneurysms in the Prevention of Aneurysmal Haemorrhages: A Randomized Comparison With Indefinite Deferral of Treatment in 2002 Patients Followed for 10 Years
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed, 41 citations in OpenAlex.
- Hydrogel versus Bare Platinum Coils in Patients with Large or Recurrent Aneurysms Prone to Recurrence after Endovascular Treatment: A Randomized Controlled Trial.AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology · 2017Trial
- Patients prone to recurrence after endovascular treatment: periprocedural results of the PRET randomized trial on large and recurrent aneurysms.AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology · 2014Trial
- Trial
- Article
- Unruptured intracranial aneurysms: development, rupture and preventive management.Nature reviews. Neurology · 2016Review
- The natural history and treatment options for unruptured intracranial aneurysms.International journal of vascular medicine · 2012Article
- The design of the Canadian UnRuptured Endovascular versus Surgery (CURES) trial.The Canadian journal of neurological sciences. Le journal canadien des sciences neurologiques · 2011Article
- Current update on the randomized controlled trials of intracranial aneurysms.Neurointervention · 2011Article
- Letter to the Editor - Re: Raymond J, Mohr JP, The TEAM-ARUBA Collaborative Groups. The Prevention of Hemorrhagic Stroke: A Review of the Rational and Ethical Principles of Clinical Trials on Unruptured Intracranial Aneurysms and Arteriovenous Malformations. Interventional Neuroradiology 14: 365-373, 2008.Interventional neuroradiology : journal of peritherapeutic neuroradiology, surgical procedures and related neurosciences · 2009Article
- Letter to the Editor - (Answer to Dr Pelz and Professor Milne): Re: Raymond J, Mohr JP. The Prevention of Hemorrhagic Stroke. Interventional Neuroradiology 14: 365-373, 2008.Interventional neuroradiology : journal of peritherapeutic neuroradiology, surgical procedures and related neurosciences · 2009Article
- The treatment of unruptured cerebral aneurysms: cause for concern?AJNR. American journal of neuroradiologyArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 5 institutions in 3 countries.
Funding
Abstract
unlabelledThe management of patients with unruptured aneurysms remains controversial. Patients with unruptured aneurysms may suffer intracranial haemorrhage, but the incidence of this event is still debated; endovascular treatment may prevent rupture, but involves immediate risks. Hence, the balance of risks and benefits of endovascular treatment is uncertain. Here, we report the design of the TEAM trial, the first international, randomized, controlled trial comparing conservative management with endovascular treatment. Primary endpoint is mortality and morbidity (modified Rankin Score >/= 3) from intracranial haemorrhage or treatment. Secondary endpoints include incidence of hemorrhagic events, morbidity related to endovascular coiling, morphological results, overall clinical outcome and quality of life. Statistical tests compare between probabilities at 5- and 10-years of 1) mortality from haemorrhage related to the lesion, excluding per-operative complications; 2) mortality from haemorrhage or from complications of treatment; 3) combined disease or treatment related mortality and morbidity in the absence of other causes of death or disability. The study will be conducted in 60 international centres and will enroll 2,002 patients equally divided between the two groups, a size sufficient to achieve 80% power at a 0.0167 significance to detect differences in 1) disease or treatment-related poor outcomes from 7-9% to 3-5%; 2) overall mortality from 16 to 11%. Duration of the study is 14 years, the first three years being for patient recruitment plus a minimum of 10 years of follow-up. The TEAM trial thus offers a means to reconcile the introduction of a new approach with the necessity to acknowledge uncertainties.
trial registrationCurrent Controlled Trials ISRCTN62758344 http://www.controlled-trials.com.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.