ArticleInternational journal of colorectal disease2008
A comparative analysis of two tissue procurement approaches for the genomic profiling of clinical colorectal cancer samples.
Article in International journal of colorectal disease, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
- Clinical implementation of RNA signatures for pharmacogenomic decision-making.Pharmacogenomics and personalized medicine · 2011Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe basis for personalized medicine is the creation of a repository of knowledge about the genetic alterations involved in disease processes. Integral to achieving this goal is the querying of well-preserved, high-quality human tissue samples. Making these findings relevant involves the interrogation of large numbers of samples. The pace with which changes have occurred versus the potential pace with which changes can occur may be indicative of problems associated with traditional approaches on collecting biospecimens. Therefore, transforming personalized medicine from concept to reality may require an alternative approach in the field of tissue specimen procurement. MATERIALS AND
methods"Exfoliation and Enrichment" (EE), a recently described rapid and cost-effective approach for procuring cells, was utilized and assessed relative to a more traditional but temporally and economically comparable approach. Material from the same tumor sample, one collected by EE but the other frozen, were procured, the DNA extracted, and the samples analyzed at the global and gene-specific level by array comparative genomic hybridization and quantitative polymerase chain reaction, respectively.
resultsBoth approaches resulted in the rapid procurement and retrieval of well-preserved cells and nucleic acids. The presence of "contaminating" normal cells in the more traditional approach masked the significance of genetic gains and losses, findings that were more readily apparent from the material derived by the EE method.
conclusionThe EE approach represents a cost-effective alternative to traditional cell-procurement methods that results in the generation of superior genomic data.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.