ArticleDer Ophthalmologe : Zeitschrift der Deutschen Ophthalmologischen Gesellschaft2008
[Patient reported outcomes. Relevance and application in ophthalmology].
Article in Der Ophthalmologe : Zeitschrift der Deutschen Ophthalmologischen Gesellschaft, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- Patient-Reported Dry Eye Outcomes After Myopic Femtosecond-LASIK: A 6-Month Prospective Analysis.Clinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.) · 2023Trial
- Topography-Guided LASIK: A Prospective Study Evaluating Patient-Reported Outcomes.Clinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.) · 2023Trial
- Timing of the Initial Postoperative Care After Cataract Surgery: A Patient's Perspective.Clinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.) · 2023Article
- [Self-reported vision in (gerontological) health services research and practice-an opening plea].Der Ophthalmologe : Zeitschrift der Deutschen Ophthalmologischen Gesellschaft · 2018Review
- Article
- [Psychometric properties of the FKS : Reliability, validity, Rasch analysis, and descriptive results of the German version of the Children's Visual Function Questionnaire].Der Ophthalmologe : Zeitschrift der Deutschen Ophthalmologischen Gesellschaft · 2011Article
- [Patient-reported and patient-weighted outcomes in ophthalmology].Der Ophthalmologe : Zeitschrift der Deutschen Ophthalmologischen Gesellschaft · 2010Review
- [Methods for estimating personal costs of disease using retinal diseases as an example].Der Ophthalmologe : Zeitschrift der Deutschen Ophthalmologischen Gesellschaft · 2010Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The use of patient-reported outcomes (PROs) - standardized assessments by the patient of the impact of illness or therapy - has been met with increasing interest over the last years. Evidence generated from PROs is used not only to support claims in the drug regulatory process but is also used in political decision making and activities by the pharmaceutical industry. PROs can reflect the benefits of a treatment very well because the patient's quality of life is a central variable, and its preservation or improvement is certainly the main objective of any therapeutic intervention. The routine use of PROs is still hampered by several methodological problems. However, there are a number of advantages, such as improved interaction between physicians and patients and shared decision making, that may result in increased compliance.
Indexed as
Identifiers
18629507What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.