Evidence map›Paper›PMID 18629207›Full record

ArticleComparative and functional genomics2005

Plant Ontology (PO): a Controlled Vocabulary of Plant Structures and Growth Stages.

Pankaj Jaiswal, Shulamit Avraham, Katica Ilic, Elizabeth A Kellogg, Susan McCouch, Anuradha Pujar, Leonore Reiser, Seung Y Rhee, Martin M Sachs, Mary Schaeffer and 5 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Comparative and functional genomics, 2005. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 63 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
63citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

63 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Sainfoin (Frontiers in plant science · 2023
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Opportunities and limits of controlled-environment plant phenotyping for climate response traits.TAG. Theoretical and applied genetics. Theoretische und angewandte Genetik · 2022
    Review
  11. Genetic Diversity of Transcription Factor Genes inFrontiers in plant science · 2022
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article

3 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors.

Pankaj JaiswalDepartment of Plant Breeding 240 Emerson Hall Cornell University Ithaca NY 14853 USA.
Shulamit Avraham
Katica Ilic
Elizabeth A Kellogg
Susan McCouch
Anuradha Pujar
Leonore Reiser
Seung Y Rhee
Martin M Sachs
Mary Schaeffer
Lincoln Stein
Peter Stevens
Leszek Vincent
Doreen Ware
Felipe Zapata

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The Plant Ontology Consortium (POC) (www.plantontology.org) is a collaborative effort among several plant databases and experts in plant systematics, botany and genomics. A primary goal of the POC is to develop simple yet robust and extensible controlled vocabularies that accurately reflect the biology of plant structures and developmental stages. These provide a network of vocabularies linked by relationships (ontology) to facilitate queries that cut across datasets within a database or between multiple databases. The current version of the ontology integrates diverse vocabularies used to describe Arabidopsis, maize and rice (Oryza sp.) anatomy, morphology and growth stages. Using the ontology browser, over 3500 gene annotations from three species-specific databases, The Arabidopsis Information Resource (TAIR) for Arabidopsis, Gramene for rice and MaizeGDB for maize, can now be queried and retrieved.

Identifiers

PMID18629207
PMCPMC2447502

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.