ArticleComparative and functional genomics2003
Biobanks for genomics and genomics for biobanks.
Article in Comparative and functional genomics, 2003. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Stakeholders' perspectives on biobank-based genomic research: systematic review of the literature.European journal of human genetics : EJHG · 2015Pooled it
- Ethical aspects of human biobanks: a systematic review.Croatian medical journal · 2011Pooled it
- KiT-GENIE, the French genetic biobank of kidney transplantation.European journal of human genetics : EJHG · 2023Article
- Biobanking as a Tool for Genomic Research: From Allele Frequencies to Cross-Ancestry Association Studies.Journal of personalized medicine · 2022Review
- Knowledge, perceptions and attitude of Egyptian physicians towards biobanking issues.PloS one · 2021Article
- The reconfiguration of biobanks in Europe under the BBMRI-ERIC framework: towards global sharing nodes?Life sciences, society and policy · 2020Article
- Demographic differences in willingness to provide broad and narrow consent for biobank research.Biopreservation and biobanking · 2015Article
- High stability of microRNAs in tissue samples of compromised quality.Virchows Archiv : an international journal of pathology · 2013Article
- Comparison of genomic DNA extraction techniques from whole blood samples: a time, cost and quality evaluation study.Molecular biology reports · 2012Article
- Biobank governance: heterogeneous modes of ordering and democratization.Journal of community genetics · 2012Article
- Ethical and Legal Issues in Biobanking for Genomic Research in Nigeria.BEOnline : journal of the West African bioethics training program · 2012Article
- A primer on a hepatocellular carcinoma bioresource bank using the cancer genome atlas guidelines: practical issues and pitfalls.World journal of surgery · 2011Article
- National Biobanks: Clinical Labor, Risk Production, and the Creation of Biovalue.Science, technology & human values · 2010Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Biobanks include biological samples and attached databases. Human biobanks occur in research, technological development and medical activities. Population genomics is highly dependent on the availability of large biobanks. Ethical issues must be considered: protecting the rights of those people whose samples or data are in biobanks (information, autonomy, confidentiality, protection of private life), assuring the non-commercial use of human body elements and the optimal use of samples and data. They balance other issues, such as protecting the rights of researchers and companies, allowing long-term use of biobanks while detailed information on future uses is not available. At the level of populations, the traditional form of informed consent is challenged. Other dimensions relate to the rights of a group as such, in addition to individual rights. Conditions of return of results and/or benefit to a population need to be defined. With 'large-scale biobanking' a marked trend in genomics, new societal dimensions appear, regarding communication, debate, regulation, societal control and valorization of such large biobanks. Exploring how genomics can help health sector biobanks to become more rationally constituted and exploited is an interesting perspective. For example, evaluating how genomic approaches can help in optimizing haematopoietic stem cell donor registries using new markers and high-throughput techniques to increase immunogenetic variability in such registries is a challenge currently being addressed. Ethical issues in such contexts are important, as not only individual decisions or projects are concerned, but also national policies in the international arena and organization of democratic debate about science, medicine and society.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.