Evidence map›Paper›PMID 18629026›Full record

ArticleComparative and functional genomics2003

Biobanks for genomics and genomics for biobanks.

Anne Cambon-Thomsen, Pascal Ducournau, Pierre-Antoine Gourraud, David Pontille

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Comparative and functional genomics, 2003. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. KiT-GENIE, the French genetic biobank of kidney transplantation.European journal of human genetics : EJHG · 2023
    Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. High stability of microRNAs in tissue samples of compromised quality.Virchows Archiv : an international journal of pathology · 2013
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Ethical and Legal Issues in Biobanking for Genomic Research in Nigeria.BEOnline : journal of the West African bioethics training program · 2012
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Anne Cambon-ThomsenInserm U 558, Epidémiologie et Analyses en Santé Publique: Risques, Maladies Chroniques et Handicaps, Faculté de Médecine, 37 Allées Jules Guesde, Toulouse cedex F-31073, France. cambon@cict.fr
Pascal Ducournau
Pierre-Antoine Gourraud
David Pontille

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Biobanks include biological samples and attached databases. Human biobanks occur in research, technological development and medical activities. Population genomics is highly dependent on the availability of large biobanks. Ethical issues must be considered: protecting the rights of those people whose samples or data are in biobanks (information, autonomy, confidentiality, protection of private life), assuring the non-commercial use of human body elements and the optimal use of samples and data. They balance other issues, such as protecting the rights of researchers and companies, allowing long-term use of biobanks while detailed information on future uses is not available. At the level of populations, the traditional form of informed consent is challenged. Other dimensions relate to the rights of a group as such, in addition to individual rights. Conditions of return of results and/or benefit to a population need to be defined. With 'large-scale biobanking' a marked trend in genomics, new societal dimensions appear, regarding communication, debate, regulation, societal control and valorization of such large biobanks. Exploring how genomics can help health sector biobanks to become more rationally constituted and exploited is an interesting perspective. For example, evaluating how genomic approaches can help in optimizing haematopoietic stem cell donor registries using new markers and high-throughput techniques to increase immunogenetic variability in such registries is a challenge currently being addressed. Ethical issues in such contexts are important, as not only individual decisions or projects are concerned, but also national policies in the international arena and organization of democratic debate about science, medicine and society.

Identifiers

PMID18629026
PMCPMC2447308

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.