Evidence map›Paper›PMID 18628432›Full record

ArticleCancer epidemiology, biomarkers & prevention : a publication of the American Association for Cancer Research, cosponsored by the American Society of Preventive Oncology2008

Performance of amplified DNA in an Illumina GoldenGate BeadArray assay.

Julie M Cunningham, Thomas A Sellers, Joellen M Schildkraut, Zachary S Fredericksen, Robert A Vierkant, Linda E Kelemen, Madhura Gadre, Catherine M Phelan, Yifan Huang, Jeffrey G Meyer and 2 more

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Cancer epidemiology, biomarkers & prevention : a publication of the American Association for Cancer Research, cosponsored by the American Society of Preventive Oncology, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. The Minnesota Center for Twin and Family Research genome-wide association study.Twin research and human genetics : the official journal of the International Society for Twin Studies · 2012
    Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Gene-based SNP discovery and genetic mapping in pea.TAG. Theoretical and applied genetics. Theoretische und angewandte Genetik · 2014
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Variation at 8q24 and 9p24 and risk of epithelial ovarian cancer.Twin research and human genetics : the official journal of the International Society for Twin Studies · 2010
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Julie M CunninghamDepartment of Health Sciences Research, College of Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN 55905, USA.
Thomas A Sellers
Joellen M Schildkraut
Zachary S Fredericksen
Robert A Vierkant
Linda E Kelemen
Madhura Gadre
Catherine M Phelan
Yifan Huang
Jeffrey G Meyer
V Shane Pankratz
Ellen L Goode

Funding

Women's Cancer ProgramP30CA015083 · NCI · MAYO CLINIC ROCHESTER · PI Felicity Enders · 1985 to 2026
$151.3M
Genetic Variation in the NF-kappaB Pathway and Ovarian Cancer EtiologyR01CA122443 · NCI · MAYO CLINIC ROCHESTER · PI GOODE, ELLEN L. · 2007 to 2012
$2.7M
Estrogen Bioactivation and Risk of Ovarian CancerR01CA086888 · NCI · MAYO CLINIC COLL OF MEDICINE, ROCHESTER · PI SELLERS, THOMAS A · 2002 to 2005
$2.0M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA015083NCI NIH HHS P30 CA 15083NCI NIH HHS R01 CA086888NCI NIH HHS R01 CA 122443NCI NIH HHS R01 CA122443NCI NIH HHS R01 CA 86888
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Whole genome amplification (WGA) offers a means to enrich DNA quantities for epidemiologic studies. We used an ovarian cancer study of 1,536 single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) and 2,368 samples to assess performance of multiple displacement amplification (MDA) WGA using an Illumina GoldenGate BeadArray. Initial screening revealed successful genotyping for 93.4% of WGA samples and 99.3% of genomic samples, and 93.2% of SNPs for WGA samples and 96.3% of SNPs for genomic samples. SNP failure was predicted by Illumina-provided designability rank, %GC (P < or = 0.002), and for WGA only, distance to telomere and Illumina-provided SNP score (P < or = 0.002). Distance to telomere and %GC were highly correlated; adjustment for %GC removed the association between distance to telomere and SNP failure. Although universally high, per-SNP call rates were related to designability rank, SNP score, %GC, minor allele frequency, distance to telomere (P < or = 0.01), and, for WGA only, Illumina-provided validation class (P < 0.001). We found excellent concordance generally (>99.0%) among 124 WGA:genomic replicates, 15 WGA replicates, 88 replicate aliquots of the same WGA preparation, and 25 genomic replicates. Where there was discordance, it was across WGA:genomic replicates but limited to only a few samples among other replicates suggesting the introduction of error. Designability rank and SNP score correlated with WGA:genomic concordance (P < 0.001). In summary, use of MDA WGA DNA is feasible; however, caution is warranted regarding SNP selection and analysis. We recommend that biological SNP characteristics, notably distance to telomere and GC content (<50% GC recommended), as well as Illumina-provided metrics be considered in the creation of GoldenGate assays using MDA WGA DNA.

Indexed as

AlbertaBiomarkers, TumorDNA, NeoplasmFemaleGenotypeHumansImmunomagnetic SeparationIncidenceNucleic Acid Amplification TechniquesOvarian NeoplasmsReproducibility of ResultsUnited StatesBiomarkers, TumorDNA, Neoplasm

Identifiers

PMID18628432
PMCPMC2732190

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.