Evidence map›Paper›PMID 18628428›Full record

ArticleCancer epidemiology, biomarkers & prevention : a publication of the American Association for Cancer Research, cosponsored by the American Society of Preventive Oncology2008

Polymorphisms in genes involved in sex hormone metabolism, estrogen plus progestin hormone therapy use, and risk of postmenopausal breast cancer.

Brenda Diergaarde, John D Potter, Eldon R Jupe, Sharmila Manjeshwar, Craig D Shimasaki, Thomas W Pugh, Daniele C Defreese, Bobby A Gramling, Ilonka Evans, Emily White

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cancer epidemiology, biomarkers & prevention : a publication of the American Association for Cancer Research, cosponsored by the American Society of Preventive Oncology, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers, 6 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed, 6 pooled it
3.4field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed, 6 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 58 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Brenda DiergaardeCancer Prevention Program, Division of Public Health Sciences, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center and Department of Epidemiology, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA. bbd3@pitt.edu
John D Potter
Eldon R Jupe
Sharmila Manjeshwar
Craig D Shimasaki
Thomas W Pugh
Daniele C Defreese
Bobby A Gramling
Ilonka Evans
Emily White
Cancer Research Center · USCape Town HVTN Immunology Laboratory / Hutchinson Centre Research Institute of South Africa · ZA

Funding

COHORT STUDY OF DIETARY SUPPLEMENTS AND CANCER RISKR01CA074846 · NCI · FRED HUTCHINSON CANCER RESEARCH CENTER · PI WHITE, EMILY · 1999 to 2005
$6.8M
NCI NIH HHS R01 CA074846NCI NIH HHS R01 CA 74846NIAMS NIH HHS AR 051025
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Hormone therapy, estrogen plus progestin (E+P) particularly, is associated with increased risk of breast cancer. Functionally relevant polymorphisms in genes involved in sex hormone metabolism may alter exposure to exogenous sex hormones and affect risk of postmenopausal breast cancer. We evaluated associations of common polymorphisms in genes involved in estrogen and/or progesterone metabolism, E+P use, and their interactions with breast cancer risk in a case-control study of postmenopausal women (324 cases; 651 controls) nested within the VITAL cohort. None of the polymorphisms studied was, by itself, statistically significantly associated with breast cancer risk. E+P use was significantly associated with increased breast cancer risk (> or =10 years versus never; odds ratio, 1.9; 95% confidence interval, 1.3-2.8; P(trend) = 0.0002). Statistically significant interactions between CYP1A1 Ile(462)Val (P(interaction) = 0.04), CYP1A1 MspI (P(interaction) = 0.003), CYP1B1 Val(432)Leu (P(interaction) = 0.007), CYP1B1 Asn(453)Ser (P(interaction) = 0.04) and PGR Val(660)Leu (P(interaction) = 0.01), and E+P use were observed. The increased risk of breast cancer associated with E+P use was greater among women with at least one rare allele of the CYP1A1 Ile(462)Val, CYP1A1 MspI, CYP1B1 Asn(453)Ser, and PGR Val(660)Leu polymorphisms than among women homozygous for the common allele of these polymorphisms. Risk of breast cancer increased little with increasing years of E+P use among women with at least one CYP1B1 Val(432) allele; a large increase in risk was seen among women homozygous for CYP1B1 Leu(432). Our results support the hypothesis that specific polymorphisms in genes involved in sex hormone metabolism may modify the effect of E+P use on breast cancer risk.

Indexed as

Polymorphism, GeneticAgedAryl Hydrocarbon HydroxylasesBreast NeoplasmsCytochrome P-450 CYP1A1Cytochrome P-450 CYP1B1EstrogensFemaleGenetic Predisposition to DiseaseGonadal Steroid HormonesHormone Replacement TherapyHumansIncidenceMiddle AgedPostmenopausePrevalenceAryl Hydrocarbon HydroxylasesCYP1B1 protein, humanCytochrome P-450 CYP1A1Cytochrome P-450 CYP1B1EstrogensGonadal Steroid HormonesProgestins

Identifiers

PMID18628428
PMCPMC2732341
OpenAlexW2140162293

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.