ReviewCurrent gastroenterology reports2008
Novel techniques to study visceral hypersensitivity in irritable bowel syndrome.
Review in Current gastroenterology reports, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 14 citations in OpenAlex.
- Efficacy of tricyclic antidepressants in irritable bowel syndrome: a meta-analysis.World journal of gastroenterology · 2009Pooled it
- Focus on the use of antidepressants to treat pediatric functional abdominal pain: current perspectives.Clinical and experimental gastroenterology · 2018Review
- Article
- Evidence for alterations in central noradrenergic signaling in irritable bowel syndrome.NeuroImage · 2012Article
- Pain perception during menstrual cycle.Current pain and headache reports · 2011Review
- Do fluctuations in ovarian hormones affect gastrointestinal symptoms in women with irritable bowel syndrome?Gender medicine · 2009Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Visceral hypersensitivity has emerged as a key hypothesis in explaining the painful symptoms of irritable bowel syndrome (IBS), and it has been proposed as a "biologic marker" for the condition. Visceral hypersensitivity can be influenced by peripheral and central mechanisms affecting pain perception. The optimal method for its assessment in humans has not been determined. Current techniques include stimulation via the computerized barostat and electrical stimulation, response measures including the lower limb reflex, and brain imaging modalities such as functional MRI and positron emission tomography. It has been shown that IBS patients have decreased sensory thresholds to colonic and rectal balloon distention by barostat. Studies using electrical stimulation and the RIII lower limb reflex have further confirmed enhanced visceral perception in IBS. Evidence from more recent neuro-imaging studies suggests that IBS patients have abnormal activation of brain circuits involved in emotional and cognitive modulation of sensory information, resulting in ineffective pain modulation; these circuits may have a pathophysiologic role in enhancing visceral perception. There are few effective pharmacologic treatments that relieve IBS symptoms, and improved understanding of brain-gut interactions and factors relating to enhanced visceral perception may guide us in developing more efficacious treatments.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.