Evidence map›Paper›PMID 18627059›Full record

Trial reportAmerican journal of medical genetics. Part A2008

Fear of health insurance loss among individuals at risk for Huntington disease.

Emily Oster, E Ray Dorsey, Jan Bausch, Aileen Shinaman, Elise Kayson, David Oakes, Ira Shoulson, Kimberly Quaid, Huntington Study Group PHAROS Investigators

Open access · greenAbstract readClinical Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in American journal of medical genetics. Part A, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 36 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. In their own words: reports of stigma and genetic discrimination by people at risk for Huntington disease in the International RESPOND-HD study.American journal of medical genetics. Part B, Neuropsychiatric genetics : the official publication of the International Society of Psychiatric Genetics · 2010
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Nursing advocacy in a postgenomic age.The Nursing clinics of North America · 2009
    Review
  13. Huntington disease (chorea) in the middle East.Sultan Qaboos University medical journal · 2009
    Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Emily OsterDepartment of Economics, The University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois, USA.
E Ray Dorsey
Jan Bausch
Aileen Shinaman
Elise Kayson
David Oakes
Ira Shoulson
Kimberly Quaid
Huntington Study Group PHAROS Investigators
University of Rochester Medical Center · USIndiana University – Purdue University Indianapolis · USUniversity of Chicago · US

Funding

Prospective Huntington At Risk Observational Study (PHAROS)R01HG002449 · NHGRI · UNIVERSITY OF ROCHESTER · PI SHOULSON, IRA · 2002 to 2009
$7.6M
The University of Rochester's Clinical and Translational Science InstituteKL2RR024136 · NCRR · UNIVERSITY OF ROCHESTER · PI PEARSON, THOMAS ARTHUR · 2006 to 2011
$4.3M
NCRR NIH HHS KL2 RR024136NHGRI NIH HHS HG-02449NHGRI NIH HHS R01 HG002449
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Genetic testing in Huntington disease, an inherited ultimately fatal neurodegenerative disorder, is infrequent despite wide availability. Factors influencing the decision to pursue testing are largely unknown. We conducted a prospective longitudinal observational study of 1,001 individuals in North America who were at risk for Huntington disease who had not pursued genetic testing prior to enrollment. We evaluated the rationale for remaining untested at baseline, determined the concerns of those who eventually pursued testing, and assessed the population's psychological attributes. We contrasted responses between those who did and did not pursue testing, and between United States and Canadian residents. The principal reasons for remaining untested were comfort with risk and uncertainty and the inability to "undo" knowledge gained. After enrollment, 83 individuals [8.3%] pursued genetic testing. Their greatest concern was losing health insurance, and 41.6% of them [vs. 6.7% of those who did not pursue testing; P < 0.001] reported paying out of pocket for testing or other medical services to conceal their genetic risk from their insurer/employer. Among individuals who were tested, more United States residents [46.1%] than Canadian residents [0.0%; P = 0.02] paid out of pocket for health services or genetic testing. Psychological attributes were similar among individuals who did and did not pursue testing. Individuals at risk for Huntington disease who pursued genetic testing feared losing medical insurance, and many paid out of pocket for medical services. Alleviating the fear of health insurance loss may help those who want to pursue genetic testing for many other conditions. [ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT0052143].

Indexed as

Insurance, HealthInsurance Selection BiasSurveys and QuestionnairesAdultCanadaFearFemaleGenetic Predisposition to DiseaseGenetic TestingHumansHuntington DiseaseMaleProspective StudiesRisk FactorsUnited States

Identifiers

PMID18627059
PMCPMC2574833
OpenAlexW2055246234

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.