Evidence map›Paper›PMID 18626654›Full record

Trial reportLangenbeck's archives of surgery2008

The use of "harmonic scalpel" versus "knot tying" for conventional "open" thyroidectomy: results of a prospective randomized study.

Celestino Pio Lombardi, Marco Raffaelli, Americo Cicchetti, Marco Marchetti, Carmela De Crea, Rossella Di Bidino, Luigi Oragano, Rocco Bellantone

Abstract readComparative StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in Langenbeck's archives of surgery, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed, 5 pooled it
5.5field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 89 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Trial
  11. Update on sutureless thyroidectomy.Il Giornale di chirurgia
    Trial
  12. Article
  13. Observational
  14. Review
  15. A comparison of surgical outcomes and complications between hemostatic devices for thyroid surgery: a network meta-analysis.European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery · 2017
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Total thyroidectomy for non-toxic multinodular goiter with versus without the use of harmonic FOCUS dissecting shears - a prospective randomized study.Wideochirurgia i inne techniki maloinwazyjne = Videosurgery and other miniinvasive techniques · 2012
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Celestino Pio LombardiDivisione di Chirurgia Endocrina, Istituto di Semeiotica Chirurgica, Universitá Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, L.go A. Gemelli 8, 00168, Rome, Italy.
Marco Raffaelli
Americo Cicchetti
Marco Marchetti
Carmela De Crea
Rossella Di Bidino
Luigi Oragano
Rocco Bellantone
Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeWe evaluated the safety and cost-effectiveness of the harmonic scalpel (HS) during conventional "open" thyroidectomy (CT). MATERIALS AND

methodsTwo hundred patients scheduled for conventional total thyroidectomy (TT) were included in the study and randomly assigned to TT with the use of HS (HS group) or with knot tying technique (KT group).

resultsMean operative time was significantly shorter in the HS group (P < 0.001), as well as the total operative room occupation time (P < 0.001). The cost of the disposable materials is significantly higher in the HS group (420.1 +/- 23.2 vs 137.8 +/- 25.3 euros; P < 0.001). Conversely, drugs, personnel and operative room charges were significantly higher in KT group patients (P < 0.001). Overall, no significant difference was found between the two groups concerning the charges of the hospitalisation (P = NS).

conclusionsHS is a safe alternative to KT, allowing for a significant reduction of operative time without increasing complications rate and overall costs and probably better utilization of health resources.

Indexed as

Surgical InstrumentsSuture TechniquesAdultAgedCost-Benefit AnalysisCross-Sectional StudiesDouble-Blind MethodEquipment DesignEquipment SafetyFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHemostatic TechniquesHumansIncidenceMaleMiddle Aged

Identifiers

PMID18626654
OpenAlexW2072283235

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.