Evidence map›Paper›PMID 18626028›Full record

Trial reportAnnals of family medicine

Integration of depression and hypertension treatment: a pilot, randomized controlled trial.

Hillary R Bogner, Heather F de Vries

Registry-linked trialOpen access · diamondAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Annals of family medicine. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03426709 (Efficacy of a Blended Low Intensity Internet-delivered Psychological Program in Patients With Multimorbidity in Primary Care. A Randomized Clinical Trial.), which is not on this map. Cited by 70 papers, 18 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
70citing papers in PubMed, 18 pooled it
4.5field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03426709 nacompletednot on this map

Efficacy of a Blended Low Intensity Internet-delivered Psychological Program in Patients With Multimorbidity in Primary Care. A Randomized Clinical Trial.

TypeinterventionalSponsorJavier Garcia CampayoRan2018 to 2020Enrolled196ConditionsDepression, Chronic Disease (Diabetes/Low Back Pain)ArmsLow intensity Internet-delivered psychotherapy
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

70 citing papers in PubMed, 18 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 140 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Pooled it
  8. Pooled it
  9. Pooled it
  10. Pooled it
  11. Pooled it
  12. Interventions for enhancing medication adherence.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2014
    Pooled it
  13. Pooled it
  14. Pooled it
  15. Pooled it
  16. Collaborative care for depression and anxiety problems.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2012
    Pooled it
  17. Pooled it
  18. Patient-Centered Outcomes of Medication Adherence Interventions: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Value in health : the journal of the International Society for Pharmacoeconomics and Outcomes Research
    Pooled it
  19. Trial
  20. Evaluating the Impact of the Prime Time Sister CirclesJournal of general internal medicine · 2023
    Trial

10 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Hillary R BognerDepartment of Family Medicine and Community Health, School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA. hillary.bogner@uphs.upenn.edu
Heather F de Vries
University of Pennsylvania · US

Funding

Adherence to Depression Treatment Among Older PatientsK23MH067671 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI BOGNER, HILLARY R · 2003 to 2007
$862k
NIMH NIH HHS MH67671-01
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeWe wanted to examine whether integrating depression treatment into care for hypertension improved adherence to antidepressant and antihypertensive medications, depression outcomes, and blood pressure control among older primary care patients.

methodsOlder adults prescribed pharmacotherapy for depression and hypertension from physicians at a large primary care practice in West Philadelphia were randomly assigned to an integrated care intervention or usual care. Outcomes were assessed at baseline, 2, 4, and 6 weeks using the Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale (CES-D) to assess depression, an electronic monitor to measure blood pressure, and the Medication Event Monitoring System to assess adherence.

resultsIn all, 64 participants aged 50 to 80 years participated. Participants in the integrated care intervention had fewer depressive symptoms (CES-D mean scores, intervention 9.9 vs usual care 19.3; P <.01), lower systolic blood pressure (intervention 127.3 mm Hg vs usual care 141.3 mm Hg; P <.01), and lower diastolic blood pressure (intervention 75.8 mm Hg vs usual care 85.0 mm Hg; P <.01) compared with participants in the usual care group at 6 weeks. Compared with the usual care group, the proportion of participants in the intervention group who had 80% or greater adherence to an antidepressant medication (intervention 71.9% vs usual care 31.3%; P <.01) and to an antihypertensive medication (intervention 78.1% vs usual care 31.3%; P <.001) was greater at 6 weeks.

conclusionA pilot, randomized controlled trial integrating depression and hypertension treatment was successful in improving patient outcomes. Integrated interventions may be more feasible and effective in real-world practices, where there are competing demands for limited resources.

Indexed as

AgedAged, 80 and overAntidepressive AgentsAntihypertensive AgentsComorbidityDelivery of Health Care, IntegratedDepressionFemaleHumansHypertensionMaleMiddle AgedPatient Care ManagementPatient CompliancePilot ProjectsPrimary Health CareAntidepressive AgentsAntihypertensive Agents

Identifiers

PMID18626028
PMCPMC2478504
OpenAlexW2167104807

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.