Evidence map›Paper›PMID 18625920›Full record

Trial reportArchives of internal medicine2008

Physicians' shared decision-making behaviors in depression care.

Henry N Young, Robert A Bell, Ronald M Epstein, Mitchell D Feldman, Richard L Kravitz

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Archives of internal medicine, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 46 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
46citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

46 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Assessments of the extent to which health-care providers involve patients in decision making: a systematic review of studies using the OPTION instrument.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2015
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Effectiveness of a decision aid for patients with depression: A randomized controlled trial.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2017
    Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Shared Decision-Making for a Dialysis Modality.Kidney international reports · 2022
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Perceptions and observations of shared decision making during pediatric otolaryngology surgical consultations.Journal of otolaryngology - head & neck surgery = Le Journal d'oto-rhino-laryngologie et de chirurgie cervico-faciale · 2019
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Henry N YoungSocial and Administrative Sciences Division, School of Pharmacy, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, USA. hnyoung@pharmacy.wisc.edu
Robert A Bell
Ronald M Epstein
Mitchell D Feldman
Richard L Kravitz

Funding

Consumer Influences of Treatment of DepressionR01MH064683 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA DAVIS · PI KRAVITZ, RICHARD L · 2002 to 2004
$2.1M
Improving Care for Comorbid Physical and Mental IllnessK24MH072756 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA DAVIS · PI KRAVITZ, RICHARD L · 2005 to 2009
$643k
NIMH NIH HHS K24 MH072756NIMH NIH HHS K24 MH72756NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH064083NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH064683
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAlthough shared decision making (SDM) has been reported to facilitate quality care, few studies have explored the extent to which SDM is implemented in primary care and factors that influence its application. This study assesses the extent to which physicians enact SDM behaviors and describes factors associated with physicians' SDM behaviors within the context of depression care.

methodsIn a secondary analysis of data from a randomized experiment, we coded 287 audiorecorded interactions between physicians and standardized patients (SPs) using the Observing Patient Involvement (OPTION) system to assess physician SDM behaviors. We performed a series of generalized linear mixed model analyses to examine physician and patient characteristics associated with SDM behavior.

resultsThe mean (SD) OPTION score was 11.4 (3.3) of 48 possible points. Older physicians (partial correlation coefficient = -0.29; beta = -0.09; P < .01) and physicians who practiced in a health maintenance organization setting (beta = -1.60; P < .01) performed fewer SDM behaviors. Longer visit duration was associated with more SDM behaviors (partial correlation coefficient = 0.31; beta = 0.08; P < .01). In addition, physicians enacted more SDM behaviors with SPs who made general (beta = 2.46; P < .01) and brand-specific (beta = 2.21; P < .01) medication requests compared with those who made no request.

conclusionsIn the context of new visits for depressive symptoms, primary care physicians performed few SDM behaviors. However, physician SDM behaviors are influenced by practice setting and patient-initiated requests for medication. Additional research is needed to identify interventions that encourage SDM when indicated.

Indexed as

Attitude of Health PersonnelPhysician-Patient RelationsAdultAge FactorsAntidepressive AgentsChi-Square DistributionCommunicationCooperative BehaviorDepressive DisorderDrug UtilizationEvaluation Studies as TopicFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedMultivariate AnalysisAntidepressive Agents

Identifiers

PMID18625920
PMCPMC2533269

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.