Shared decision making: have we missed the obvious?

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

1. Decisional autonomy undermines advisees' judgments of experts in medicine and in life.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2020
   Trial
2. Information Needs of Older Women With Early-Stage Breast Cancer When Making Radiation Therapy Decisions.International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics · 2017
   Article
3. "What the patient wants…": Lay attitudes towards end-of-life decisions in Germany and Israel.Medicine, health care, and philosophy · 2015
   Article
4. English language proficiency, health literacy, and trust in physician are associated with shared decision making in rheumatoid arthritis.The Journal of rheumatology · 2014
   Article
5. [Alveolar epithelial cell injury as an etiopathogenic factor in pulmonary fibrosis].Archivos de bronconeumologia · 2012
   Review
6. Using visual displays to communicate risk of cancer to women from diverse race/ethnic backgrounds.Patient education and counseling · 2012
   Article
7. Pictures speak louder than numbers: on communicating medical risks to immigrants with limited non-native language proficiency.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2011
   Article
8. [Importance of patient involvement in disease self-management: the expert patient. Role of new technologies to support patient autonomy].Atencion primaria · 2010
   Article
9. Should guidelines incorporate evidence on patient preferences?Journal of general internal medicine · 2009
   Article
10. Mutual influence in shared decision making: a collaborative study of patients and physicians.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2009
    Article

Corrections and comments

• Comment on
  Physicians' shared decision-making behaviors in depression care.2008

Authors and funding

1 author.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as