Evidence map›Paper›PMID 18625731›Full record

ArticleInfection and immunity2008

Vaccination with heat shock protein 60 induces a protective immune response against experimental Paracoccidioides brasiliensis pulmonary infection.

Renata de Bastos Ascenço Soares, Francisco J Gomez, Célia Maria de Almeida Soares, George S Deepe

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Infection and immunity, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed, 57 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. The Heat Shock Protein 60 and Pap1 Participate in theJournal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021
    Article
  9. Chaperone Networks in Fungal Pathogens of Humans.Journal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021
    Review
  10. Review
  11. Updates inJournal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Expression of Hsp60 and its cell location in Paracoccidioides brasiliensis.Revista do Instituto de Medicina Tropical de Sao Paulo · 2020
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Heat Shock Proteins in Histoplasma and Paracoccidioides.Clinical and vaccine immunology : CVI · 2017
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Vaccine immunity against fungal infections.Current opinion in immunology · 2014
    Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Renata de Bastos Ascenço SoaresLaboratório de Biologia Molecular, ICBII, Universidade Federal de Goiás, 74001-970 Goiânia, Goiás, Brazil.
Francisco J Gomez
Célia Maria de Almeida Soares
George S Deepe
University of Cincinnati Medical Center · USUniversidade Federal de Goiás · BR

Funding

PROTECTIVE ANTIGENS FROM HISTOPLASMA CAPSULATUMR01AI034361 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF CINCINNATI · PI DEEPE, GEORGE S. · 1993 to 2007
$2.5M
NIAID NIH HHS AI-34361NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI034361PHS HHS 427747
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Paracoccidioides brasiliensis causes a chronic granulomatous mycosis prevalent in Latin America. The successful resolution of infection with this fungus is dependent on the activation of cellular immunity. We previously identified heat shock protein 60 (HSP60) as a target of the humoral response in paracoccidioidomycosis. Herein we expressed the gene encoding HSP60 in Escherichia coli and analyzed the immunological activity of this recombinant antigen. The immunization of BALB/c mice with recombinant protein emulsified in adjuvant stimulated a cellular immune response. Splenocytes from immunized mice proliferated in response to antigen and released interleukin-12 and gamma interferon (IFN-gamma). Vaccination with HSP60 reduced the fungal burden in mice given 10(6) or 10(7) yeasts and protected mice from a lethal challenge. The efficacy of the vaccination was blunted by the neutralization of IFN-gamma. CD4(+) cells were necessary for the efficacy of the vaccination in both the afferent and efferent phases. Thus, we have demonstrated that this immunodominant antigen is a candidate for the development of a vaccine against this fungus.

Indexed as

AnimalsCD4-Positive T-LymphocytesCell ProliferationChaperonin 60Cloning, MolecularEscherichia coliFungal VaccinesGene ExpressionInterferon-gammaInterleukin-12LiverLungLymphocytesMiceMice, Inbred BALB CParacoccidioidesChaperonin 60Fungal VaccinesInterferon-gammaInterleukin-12Recombinant Proteins

Identifiers

PMID18625731
PMCPMC2519447
OpenAlexW2143562420

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.