Evidence map›Paper›PMID 18625449›Full record

ReviewNeurotherapeutics : the journal of the American Society for Experimental NeuroTherapeutics2008

Measuring target effect of proposed disease-modifying therapies in Alzheimer's disease.

Randall J Bateman, William E Klunk

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Neurotherapeutics : the journal of the American Society for Experimental NeuroTherapeutics, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Revolutionizing Alzheimer's disease and clinical trials through biomarkers.Alzheimer's & dementia (Amsterdam, Netherlands) · 2015
    Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Monitoring autophagy in the treatment of protein aggregate diseases: steps toward identifying autophagic biomarkers.Neurotherapeutics : the journal of the American Society for Experimental NeuroTherapeutics · 2013
    Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Randall J BatemanDepartment of Neurology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri 63110, USA. batemanr@wustl.edu
William E Klunk

Funding

alphabeta AND PROTEOMIC ANALYSIS OF CSF IN AD AND AGINGK23AG030946 · NIA · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI BATEMAN, RANDALL J · 2007 to 2010
$754k
NIA NIH HHS K23 AG030946
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Alzheimer's disease (AD) is the most common cause of dementia and is an increasing public health problem. Because of the severity and increasing prevalence of the disease in the population, it is urgent that better treatments be developed. Active research efforts over the past several decades have produced a vast knowledge base regarding AD natural history, pathology, and key biological mediators involved in pathogenesis. As knowledge of the biomolecular mechanisms of AD has increased over the past several decades, there has been a growing consensus on the pathophysiology of the disease. These scientific advancements have led to proposals for disease-modifying therapeutic interventions that promise to significantly alter the course of AD. The translation from preclinical models to human studies requires therapeutic biomarkers to increase the likelihood of success. This review covers the current methods and technologies used in the therapeutic translation of proposed disease-modifying therapies for AD.

Indexed as

Alzheimer DiseaseAmyloid beta-PeptidesAnalgesics, Non-NarcoticAnimalsClinical Trials as TopicDrug DesignHumanstau ProteinsAmyloid beta-PeptidesAnalgesics, Non-Narcotictau Proteins

Identifiers

PMID18625449
PMCPMC2588423

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.