Evidence map›Paper›PMID 18625054›Full record

ArticleBMC systems biology2008

Multiway modeling and analysis in stem cell systems biology.

Bülent Yener, Evrim Acar, Pheadra Aguis, Kristin Bennett, Scott L Vandenberg, George E Plopper

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC systems biology, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
2.4field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 44 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Tensor factorization toward precision medicine.Briefings in bioinformatics · 2017
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Subgraph augmented non-negative tensor factorization (SANTF) for modeling clinical narrative text.Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA · 2015
    Article
  8. In-silico models of stem cell and developmental systems.Theoretical biology & medical modelling · 2014
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Bülent YenerDepartment of Computer Science, Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute, 110 8th Street, Troy, NY 12180, USA. yener@cs.rpi.edu
Evrim Acar
Pheadra Aguis
Kristin Bennett
Scott L Vandenberg
George E Plopper
Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute · USSiena College · USUniversity of Tartu · EE

Funding

PHS HHS 1 R01 RB002197
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSystems biology refers to multidisciplinary approaches designed to uncover emergent properties of biological systems. Stem cells are an attractive target for this analysis, due to their broad therapeutic potential. A central theme of systems biology is the use of computational modeling to reconstruct complex systems from a wealth of reductionist, molecular data (e.g., gene/protein expression, signal transduction activity, metabolic activity, etc.). A number of deterministic, probabilistic, and statistical learning models are used to understand sophisticated cellular behaviors such as protein expression during cellular differentiation and the activity of signaling networks. However, many of these models are bimodal i.e., they only consider row-column relationships. In contrast, multiway modeling techniques (also known as tensor models) can analyze multimodal data, which capture much more information about complex behaviors such as cell differentiation. In particular, tensors can be very powerful tools for modeling the dynamic activity of biological networks over time. Here, we review the application of systems biology to stem cells and illustrate application of tensor analysis to model collagen-induced osteogenic differentiation of human mesenchymal stem cells.

resultsWe applied Tucker1, Tucker3, and Parallel Factor Analysis (PARAFAC) models to identify protein/gene expression patterns during extracellular matrix-induced osteogenic differentiation of human mesenchymal stem cells. In one case, we organized our data into a tensor of type protein/gene locus link x gene ontology category x osteogenic stimulant, and found that our cells expressed two distinct, stimulus-dependent sets of functionally related genes as they underwent osteogenic differentiation. In a second case, we organized DNA microarray data in a three-way tensor of gene IDs x osteogenic stimulus x replicates, and found that application of tensile strain to a collagen I substrate accelerated the osteogenic differentiation induced by a static collagen I substrate.

conclusionOur results suggest gene- and protein-level models whereby stem cells undergo transdifferentiation to osteoblasts, and lay the foundation for mechanistic, hypothesis-driven studies. Our analysis methods are applicable to a wide range of stem cell differentiation models.

Indexed as

Models, BiologicalSystems BiologyCell DifferentiationGene Expression RegulationHumansMesenchymal Stem CellsOligonucleotide Array Sequence AnalysisOsteogenesisStem CellsTime Factors

Identifiers

PMID18625054
PMCPMC2527292
OpenAlexW2126552798

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.