Evidence map›Paper›PMID 18624683›Full record

ReviewExpert opinion on drug metabolism & toxicology2008

Efavirenz--still first-line king?

Brookie M Best, Miguel Goicoechea

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Expert opinion on drug metabolism & toxicology, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 23% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 48 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. The HIV antiretroviral drug efavirenz has LSD-like properties.Neuropsychopharmacology : official publication of the American College of Neuropsychopharmacology · 2013
    Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Brookie M BestUniversity of California, Division of Pharmacology and Drug Discovery, San Diego, La Jolla, CA 92093-0719, USA. brookie@ucsd.edu
Miguel Goicoechea
Sarepta Therapeutics (United States) · USUniversity of California, San Diego · US

Funding

Pharmacokinetics and Pathogenesis of Treatment ResponsesK23AI066901 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO · PI GOICOECHEA, MIGUEL A. · 2007 to 2010
$437k
NIAID NIH HHS K23 AI066901
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundEfavirenz is a potent, safe and tolerable non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor (NNRTI) recommended as initial therapy. Recently, several new antiretroviral drugs, including second generation NNRTIs, protease-inhibitors, an integrase-inhibitor and a CCR5 inhibitor, have become or will be shortly available.

objectiveThis article will review relevant efficacy and safety data of efavirenz compared to these novel agents or certain common alternate drugs currently used as initial therapy in treatment-naive patients.

methodsPublished articles and conference presentations pertaining to efavirenz and/or the newer antiretroviral agents were evaluated. RESULTS/

conclusionsEfavirenz will continue to be preferred initial therapy for now. If longer-term studies of integrase inhibitors and second-generation NNRTIs confirm initial findings, they will eventually supplant efavirenz as preferred first-line agents.

Indexed as

AlkynesAnimalsAnti-HIV AgentsBenzoxazinesCyclopropanesDrug InteractionsDrug Resistance, ViralHIV InfectionsHumansReverse Transcriptase InhibitorsAlkynesAnti-HIV AgentsBenzoxazinesCyclopropanesefavirenzReverse Transcriptase Inhibitors

Identifiers

PMID18624683
PMCPMC5761737
OpenAlexW2034470753

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.