Evidence map›Paper›PMID 18623123›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical laboratory analysis2008

Comparison between a liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry assay and a fluorescent polarization immunoassay to measure whole blood everolimus concentration in heart and renal transplantations.

Eric Dailly, G Deslandes, M Hourmant, T Petit, C Renaud, M Treilhaud, P Jolliet

Open access · bronzeAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical laboratory analysis, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 32% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Eric DaillyClinical Pharmacology Department, Hôtel Dieu, CHU de Nantes, France. eric.dailly@chu-nantes.fr
G Deslandes
M Hourmant
T Petit
C Renaud
M Treilhaud
P Jolliet
Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Nantes · FRHôpital Laennec · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Various methods [fluorescent polarization immunoassay (FPIA) and liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) assay] are used for therapeutic drug monitoring of everolimus. The aim of this study is to compare these assays in renal and heart transplantation. The correlation between results was investigated by linear regression in 44 patients (24 heart recipients and 20 renal recipients--137 samples). The comparison between assays was performed by a paired t-test. A highly significant correlation was found between FPIA and LC-MS/MS in heart and renal recipients [FPIA=0.851 x LC-MS/MS+1.773r(2)=0.8738 (P<0.001)]. Paired t-tests did not show a significant difference between everolimus whole blood concentrations in the populations of heart and renal recipients or heart recipients or renal recipients. FPIA and LC-MS/MS assays gave consistent overall results although some significant differences were observed in some samples between these methods indicating that FPIA assay has limitations that deserve further investigations.

Indexed as

Chromatography, High Pressure LiquidCohort StudiesDrug MonitoringEverolimusFemaleFluorescence Polarization ImmunoassayHeart TransplantationHumansImmunosuppressive AgentsKidney TransplantationMaleMiddle AgedReproducibility of ResultsSirolimusTandem Mass SpectrometryEverolimusImmunosuppressive AgentsSirolimus

Identifiers

PMID18623123
PMCPMC6649002
OpenAlexW1979700045

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.