Evidence map›Paper›PMID 18621950›Full record

SynthesisJournal of epidemiology and community health2008

Integrating research and action: a systematic review of community-based participatory research to address health disparities in environmental and occupational health in the USA.

W K Cook

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Journal of epidemiology and community health, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 82 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
82citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

82 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Child and youth participatory interventions for addressing lifestyle-related childhood obesity: a systematic review.Obesity reviews : an official journal of the International Association for the Study of Obesity · 2016
    Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Community-Engaged Research in Early Home Visiting: A Scoping Review of Peer-Reviewed Literature.Prevention science : the official journal of the Society for Prevention Research · 2025
    Article
  7. Building a diverse national research advisory board.Journal of clinical and translational science · 2025
    Article
  8. Review
  9. COVID-19 clinical trials: who is likely to participate and why?Journal of comparative effectiveness research · 2024
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Leveraging an Implementation Science Framework to Measure the Impact of Efforts to Scale Out aInternational journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Article
  20. Article

22 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

W K CookAlcohol Research Group, University of California, Berkeley, 6475 Christie Avenue, Suite 400, Emeryville, CA 94608, USA. wkcook@berkeley.edu

Funding

GRADUATE RESEARCH TRAINING ON ALCOHOL PROBLEMST32AA007240 · NIAAA · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA BERKELEY · PI William C. Kerr · 1985 to 2026
$7.5M
NIAAA NIH HHS T32 AA007240
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionIntegrating research and action represents a goal and key principles of community-based participatory research (CBPR), but there has been little effort to synthesise the literature to evaluate whether such integration is occurring.

objectives(1) To examine the extent to which CBPR integrates action to effect community-level change and (2) to ascertain factors that facilitate such integration.

methodsOriginal articles reporting on CBPR in environmental and occupational health in the USA were identified primarily through a MEDLINE search. Inceptions, processes, methods and outcomes of the projects were reviewed.

resultsIn 14 of the 20 studies reviewed, CBPR led to community-level action to improve the health and well-being of the community members. Observational studies that investigated problems posed by the affected community and that incorporated qualitative methods were more likely to lead to action. The collaboration among government scientists, university researchers and community partners emerged as a new model of CBPR partnerships that effectively integrates research and action.

conclusionsTo help CBPR better integrate research and action, a shift towards community-initiated and action-oriented observational studies might be needed.

Indexed as

Environmental HealthOccupational HealthBiomedical ResearchCommunity Health PlanningCommunity-Institutional RelationsCommunity ParticipationHumansResearch DesignSocioeconomic FactorsUnited States

Identifiers

PMID18621950
PMCPMC2772828

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.