Evidence map›Paper›PMID 18621893›Full record

ArticleJournal of bacteriology2008

Characterization of the accessory Sec system of Staphylococcus aureus.

Ian R Siboo, Donald O Chaffin, Craig E Rubens, Paul M Sullam

Open access · greenAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of bacteriology, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 68 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
68citing papers in PubMed
5.2field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

68 citing papers in PubMed, 114 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. The roles of theJournal of bacteriology · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

8 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Ian R SibooDivision of Infectious Diseases, Veterans Affairs Medical Center, University of California, San Francisco, CA 94121, USA.
Donald O Chaffin
Craig E Rubens
Paul M Sullam
San Francisco VA Medical Center · USSeattle Children's Hospital · USUniversity of California, San Francisco · USUniversity of Washington · US

Funding

SCCOR in Translational Research in Acute Lung InjuryP50HL073996 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI MARTIN, THOMAS R · 2003 to 2007
$15.7M
STREPTOCOCCAL PLATELET BINDING AND ENDOCARDITISR01AI041513 · NIAID · NORTHERN CALIFORNIA INSTITUTE RES &EDUC · PI SULLAM, PAUL M. · 1997 to 2019
$5.6M
Prophage-Encoded Binding of S. mitis to Human PlateletsR01AI057433 · NIAID · NORTHERN CALIFORNIA INSTITUTE RES &EDUC · PI SULLAM, PAUL M. · 2004 to 2008
$1.8M
NHLBI NIH HHS HL073996NHLBI NIH HHS P50 HL073996NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI041513NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI057433
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The SraP adhesin of Staphylococcus aureus is a member of a highly conserved family of serine-rich surface glycoproteins of gram-positive bacteria. For streptococci, export of the SraP homologs requires a specialized transport pathway (the accessory Sec system). Compared to streptococci, however, SraP is predicted to differ in its signal peptide and glycosylation, which may affect its dependence on a specialized system for transport. In addition, two genes (asp4 and asp5) essential for export in Streptococcus gordonii are missing in S. aureus. Thus, the selectivity of the accessory Sec system in S. aureus may also differ compared to streptococci. To address these issues, the five genes encoding the putative accessory Sec system (secY2, secA2, and asp1-3) were disrupted individually in S. aureus ISP479C, and the resultant mutants were examined for SraP export. Disruption of secA2 resulted in the near complete loss of SraP surface expression. Similar results were seen with disruption of secY2 and asp1, asp2, or asp3. To assess whether the accessory Sec system transported other substrates, we compared secreted proteomes of ISP479C and a secA2 isogenic mutant, by two-dimensional fluorescence difference gel electrophoresis. Although two consistent differences in proteome content were noted between the strains, neither protein appeared to be a likely substrate for accessory Sec export. Thus, the accessory Sec system of S. aureus is required for the export of SraP, and it appears to be dedicated to the transport of this substrate exclusively.

Indexed as

Adhesins, BacterialBacterial ProteinsElectrophoresis, Gel, Two-DimensionalGene ExpressionMutagenesisOligonucleotide Array Sequence AnalysisProtein TransportProteomeStaphylococcus aureusTranscription, GeneticAdhesins, BacterialBacterial ProteinsProteome

Identifiers

PMID18621893
PMCPMC2546797
OpenAlexW2154311498

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.