Evidence map›Paper›PMID 18620390›Full record

ArticleJournal of the American Chemical Society2008

Atomistic insights into rhodopsin activation from a dynamic model.

Irina G Tikhonova, Robert B Best, Stanislav Engel, Marvin C Gershengorn, Gerhard Hummer, Stefano Costanzi

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the American Chemical Society, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
2.4field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 34 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Deconstructing activation events in rhodopsin.Journal of the American Chemical Society · 2013
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Activation mechanism of the β2-adrenergic receptor.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2011
    Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Irina G TikhonovaLaboratory of Biological Modeling, National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland 20892, USA.
Robert B Best
Stanislav Engel
Marvin C Gershengorn
Gerhard Hummer
Stefano Costanzi
National Institutes of Health · USNational Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases · US

Funding

Theory &simulation of protein dynamics, folding,&functZ01DK029033 · NIDDK · NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF DIABETES AND DIGESTIVE AND KIDNEY DISEASES · PI HUMMER, GERHARD · 2000 to 2008
$960k
Molecular modeling of G protein-coupled receptorsZ01DK013025 · NIDDK · NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF DIABETES AND DIGESTIVE AND KIDNEY DISEASES · PI SHERMAN, ARTHUR · 2007 to 2008
$742k
Seven Transmembrane-spanning Receptors: Molecular MechanismsZ01DK047045 · NIDDK · NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF DIABETES AND DIGESTIVE AND KIDNEY DISEASES · PI GERSHENGORN, MARVIN · 2007 to 2008
$573k
Intramural NIH HHS Z01 DK013025
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Rhodopsin, the light sensitive receptor responsible for blue-green vision, serves as a prototypical G protein-coupled receptor (GPCR). Upon light absorption, it undergoes a series of conformational changes that lead to the active form, metarhodopsin II (META II), initiating a signaling cascade through binding to the G protein transducin (G(t)). Here, we first develop a structural model of META II by applying experimental distance restraints to the structure of lumi-rhodopsin (LUMI), an earlier intermediate. The restraints are imposed by using a combination of biased molecular dynamics simulations and perturbations to an elastic network model. We characterize the motions of the transmembrane helices in the LUMI-to-META II transition and the rearrangement of interhelical hydrogen bonds. We then simulate rhodopsin activation in a dynamic model to study the path leading from LUMI to our META II model for wild-type rhodopsin and a series of mutants. The simulations show a strong correlation between the transition dynamics and the pharmacological phenotypes of the mutants. These results help identify the molecular mechanisms of activation in both wild type and mutant rhodopsin. While static models can provide insights into the mechanisms of ligand recognition and predict ligand affinity, a dynamic model of activation could be applicable to study the pharmacology of other GPCRs and their ligands, offering a key to predictions of basal activity and ligand efficacy.

Indexed as

Models, MolecularHydrogen BondingMolecular StructureMotionMutationProtein ConformationProtein Structure, SecondaryRhodopsinmetarhodopsinsRhodopsin

Identifiers

PMID18620390
PMCPMC2556288
OpenAlexW2033036547

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.