Evidence map›Paper›PMID 18619997›Full record

ReviewProgress in biophysics and molecular biology2008

Intrinsic disorder in scaffold proteins: getting more from less.

Marc S Cortese, Vladimir N Uversky, A Keith Dunker

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Progress in biophysics and molecular biology, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 145 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
145citing papers in PubMed
7.9field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

145 citing papers in PubMed, 296 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. amyloid-predict and LLPS-predict: Predicting phase separation propensities in the intrinsically disordered proteome.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2026
    Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Biomolecular NMR assignments · 2025
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Bipartite binding of the intrinsically disordered scaffold protein JIP1 to the kinase JNK1.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article

85 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Marc S CorteseDepartment of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN 46202, USA.
Vladimir N Uversky
A Keith Dunker
Indiana University School of MedicineInstitute for Biological Instrumentation · RU

Funding

Bioinformatics linkage of protein disorder and functionR01LM007688 · NLM · INDIANA UNIV-PURDUE UNIV AT INDIANAPOLIS · PI DUNKER, ALAN KEITH · 2003 to 2006
$1.3M
Mining the Structural Genomics Initiative for DisorderR01GM071714 · NIGMS · INDIANA UNIV-PURDUE UNIV AT INDIANAPOLIS · PI DUNKER, ALAN KEITH · 2006 to 2009
$1.1M
NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM071714NLM NIH HHS R01 LM007688
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Regulation, recognition and cell signaling involve the coordinated actions of many players. Signaling scaffolds, with their ability to bring together proteins belonging to common and/or interlinked pathways, play crucial roles in orchestrating numerous events by coordinating specific interactions among signaling proteins. This review examines the roles of intrinsic disorder (ID) in signaling scaffold protein function. Several well-characterized scaffold proteins with structurally and functionally characterized ID regions are used here to illustrate the importance of ID for scaffolding function. These examples include scaffolds that are mostly disordered, only partially disordered or those in which the ID resides in a scaffold partner. Specific scaffolds discussed include RNase, voltage-activated potassium channels, axin, BRCA1, GSK-3beta, p53, Ste5, titin, Fus3, BRCA1, MAP2, D-AKAP2 and AKAP250. Among the mechanisms discussed are: molecular recognition features, fly-casting, ease of encounter complex formation, structural isolation of partners, modulation of interactions between bound partners, masking of intramolecular interaction sites, maximized interaction surface per residue, toleration of high evolutionary rates, binding site overlap, allosteric modification, palindromic binding, reduced constraints for alternative splicing, efficient regulation via posttranslational modification, efficient regulation via rapid degradation, protection of normally solvent-exposed sites, enhancing the plasticity of interaction and molecular crowding. We conclude that ID can enhance scaffold function by a diverse array of mechanisms. In other words, scaffold proteins utilize several ID-facilitated mechanisms to enhance function, and by doing so, get more functionality from less structure.

Indexed as

Allosteric SiteAlternative SplicingAnimalsBinding SitesBiological EvolutionBiophysicsHumansModels, BiologicalMolecular ConformationProtein BindingProtein ConformationProtein FoldingProteinsSignal TransductionSolventsProteinsSolvents

Identifiers

PMID18619997
PMCPMC2671330
OpenAlexW2049291900

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.