ArticleDigestive diseases and sciences2009
Site specific delivery of microencapsulated fish oil to the gastrointestinal tract of the rat.
Article in Digestive diseases and sciences, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 48 citations in OpenAlex.
- Immunometabolic Reprogramming by Black Soldier Fly (Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2026Review
- Dataset on applying HPMC polymer to improve encapsulation efficiency and stability of the fish oil: In vitro evaluation.Data in brief · 2020Article
- Complementary and Alternative Medicine Strategies for Therapeutic Gut Microbiota Modulation in Inflammatory Bowel Disease and their Next-Generation Approaches.Gastroenterology clinics of North America · 2017Review
- Microencapsulation of fish oil using supercritical antisolvent process.Journal of food and drug analysis · 2017Article
- Effects of casoxin 4 on morphine inhibition of small animal intestinal contractility and gut transit in the mouse.Clinical and experimental gastroenterology · 2011Article
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The aim of this study was to design food grade matrices to deliver microencapsulated fish oil to the large bowel of the rat where the potential exists to retard inflammation and cancer development. Digestion in simulated gastric fluid and intestinal fluid demonstrated that only 4-6% of oil was released from the following dried emulsion formulations: 50% fish oil encapsulated in heated casein-glucose-dried glucose syrup (1:1:1) (Cas-Glu-DGS-50); 25% fish oil in casein-modified resistant starch (Hylon VII) (1:1) (Cas-Hylon-25); or 25% fish oil in Cas-Glu-Hylon (1:1:1) (Cas-Glu-Hylon-25). A short-term gavage study (0-12 h) with fish oil and Cas-Glu-DGS-50 demonstrated the appearance of fish oil long chain (LC) n-3 polyunsaturated fatty acids (PUFA) into the plasma indicating specific small intestinal absorption with little LC n-3 PUFA reaching the large bowel. In a 2-week-long term, daily gavage study, the bioavailability of fish oil and fish oil in Cas-Glu-DGS-50 or Cas-Hylon-25 demonstrated that fish oil and Cas-Glu-DGS-50 LC n-3 PUFA were incorporated into the tissue of the small intestine and colon, whereas Cas-Hylon-25 was resistant to degradation in the small intestine. The use of modified Hylon VII for targeted colonic delivery was confirmed in the final short-term gavage study (0-14 h) using Cas-Glu-Hylon-25 with [(14)C]-trilinolenin as a marker incorporated into the microcapsules, where up to 60% of the labeled oil reached the large bowel. Depending on the microencapsulating matrix employed, fish oil can be delivered selectively to the small intestine or to a high degree to the large bowel.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.