ArticlePLoS computational biology2008
Unraveling protein networks with power graph analysis.
Article in PLoS computational biology, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 44 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
44 citing papers in PubMed.
- Sequence-based prediction of drug-target binding using machine learning, deep learning and ensemble models without 3D structural information.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Biomarkers and immunomodulatory effect of erythropoietin in postoperative ileus.BMC research notes · 2026Article
- Revisiting microgenderome: detecting and cataloguing sexually unique and enriched species in human microbiomes.BMC biology · 2024Article
- An Unsupervised Classifier for Whole-Genome Phylogenies, the Maxwell© Tool.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023Article
- Centrality of drug targets in protein networks.BMC bioinformatics · 2021Article
- Metage2Metabo, microbiota-scale metabolic complementarity for the identification of key species.eLife · 2020Article
- Understanding complex dynamics of behavioral, neurochemical and transcriptomic changes induced by prolonged chronic unpredictable stress in zebrafish.Scientific reports · 2020Article
- Article
- Bipartite graphs in systems biology and medicine: a survey of methods and applications.GigaScience · 2018Review
- Article
- Integrative genomics of microglia implicates DLG4 (PSD95) in the white matter development of preterm infants.Nature communications · 2017Article
- A novel framework for the identification of drug target proteins: Combining stacked auto-encoders with a biased support vector machine.PloS one · 2017Article
- Drug Target Protein-Protein Interaction Networks: A Systematic Perspective.BioMed research international · 2017Article
- Incorporating topological information for predicting robust cancer subnetwork markers in human protein-protein interaction network.BMC bioinformatics · 2016Article
- A literature mining-based approach for identification of cellular pathways associated with chemoresistance in cancer.Briefings in bioinformatics · 2016Article
- Using biological networks to integrate, visualize and analyze genomics data.Genetics, selection, evolution : GSE · 2016Review
- Analysis of weighted co-regulatory networks in maize provides insights into new genes and regulatory mechanisms related to inositol phosphate metabolism.BMC genomics · 2016Article
- Bridging topological and functional information in protein interaction networks by short loops profiling.Scientific reports · 2015Article
- FunMod: a Cytoscape plugin for identifying functional modules in undirected protein-protein networks.Genomics, proteomics & bioinformatics · 2014Article
- NetVenn: an integrated network analysis web platform for gene lists.Nucleic acids research · 2014Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Networks play a crucial role in computational biology, yet their analysis and representation is still an open problem. Power Graph Analysis is a lossless transformation of biological networks into a compact, less redundant representation, exploiting the abundance of cliques and bicliques as elementary topological motifs. We demonstrate with five examples the advantages of Power Graph Analysis. Investigating protein-protein interaction networks, we show how the catalytic subunits of the casein kinase II complex are distinguishable from the regulatory subunits, how interaction profiles and sequence phylogeny of SH3 domains correlate, and how false positive interactions among high-throughput interactions are spotted. Additionally, we demonstrate the generality of Power Graph Analysis by applying it to two other types of networks. We show how power graphs induce a clustering of both transcription factors and target genes in bipartite transcription networks, and how the erosion of a phosphatase domain in type 22 non-receptor tyrosine phosphatases is detected. We apply Power Graph Analysis to high-throughput protein interaction networks and show that up to 85% (56% on average) of the information is redundant. Experimental networks are more compressible than rewired ones of same degree distribution, indicating that experimental networks are rich in cliques and bicliques. Power Graphs are a novel representation of networks, which reduces network complexity by explicitly representing re-occurring network motifs. Power Graphs compress up to 85% of the edges in protein interaction networks and are applicable to all types of networks such as protein interactions, regulatory networks, or homology networks.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.