Evidence map›Paper›PMID 18616424›Full record

ReviewAnnual review of cell and developmental biology2008

Replicative aging in yeast: the means to the end.

K A Steinkraus, M Kaeberlein, B K Kennedy

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Annual review of cell and developmental biology, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 159 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
159citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

159 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Calorie restriction does not elicit a robust extension of replicative lifespan in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2014
    Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

99 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

K A SteinkrausDepartment of Pathology, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington 98195, USA. kaeber@u.washington.edu
M Kaeberlein
B K Kennedy

Funding

Genome-wide Analysis of Aging in YeastR01AG025549 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI KENNEDY, BRIAN K · 2006 to 2010
$1.5M
NIA NIH HHS R01 AG025549
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Progress in aging research is now rapid, and surprisingly, studies in a single-celled eukaryote are a driving force. The genetic modulators of replicative life span in yeast are being identified, the molecular events that accompany aging are being discovered, and the extent to which longevity pathways are conserved between yeast and multicellular eukaryotes is being tested. In this review, we provide a brief retrospective view on the development of yeast as a model for aging and then turn to recent discoveries that have pushed aging research into novel directions and also linked aging in yeast to well-developed hypotheses in mammals. Although the question of what causes aging still cannot be answered definitively, that day may be rapidly approaching.

Indexed as

Cellular SenescenceAnimalsCaloric RestrictionCell DivisionHumansLongevityNeoplasmsNeurodegenerative DiseasesPhenotypeSaccharomyces cerevisiaeSignal Transduction

Identifiers

PMID18616424
PMCPMC2730916

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.