Evidence map›Paper›PMID 18614753›Full record

ReviewJournal of neurophysiology2008

Behavioral states, network states, and sensory response variability.

Alfredo Fontanini, Donald B Katz

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of neurophysiology, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 107 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
107citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

107 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Direct Piriform-to-Auditory Cortical Projections Shape Auditory-Olfactory Integration.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2024
    Article
  8. Behavioural stochastic resonance across the lifespan.Cognitive, affective & behavioral neuroscience · 2024
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Multitasking via baseline control in recurrent neural networks.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2023
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Hierarchical unimodal processing within the primary somatosensory cortex during a bimodal detection task.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2022
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

47 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Alfredo FontaniniDepartment of Psychology and Volen National Center for Complex Systems, Brandeis University, Waltham, Massachusetts, USA. alfredo.fontanini@stonybrook.edu
Donald B Katz

Funding

The amygdala-cortical loop as the basis of taste processingR01DC007703 · NIDCD · BRANDEIS UNIVERSITY · PI Donald B Katz · 2006 to 2026
$7.1M
Time and the forebrain coding of taste learning.R01DC006666 · NIDCD · BRANDEIS UNIVERSITY · PI KATZ, DONALD B · 2005 to 2025
$6.3M
Effects of expectation on gustatory cortex activityR03DC008885 · NIDCD · STATE UNIVERSITY NEW YORK STONY BROOK · PI FONTANINI, ALFREDO · 2007 to 2009
$230k
NIDCD NIH HHS DC-006666NIDCD NIH HHS DC-007102NIDCD NIH HHS DC-008885NIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC007703
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We review data demonstrating that single-neuron sensory responses change with the states of the neural networks (indexed in terms of spectral properties of local field potentials) in which those neurons are embedded. We start with broad network changes--different levels of anesthesia and sleep--and then move to studies demonstrating that the sensory response plasticity associated with attention and experience can also be conceptualized as functions of network state changes. This leads naturally to the recent data that can be interpreted to suggest that even brief experience can change sensory responses via changes in network states and that trial-to-trial variability in sensory responses is a nonrandom function of network fluctuations, as well. We suggest that the CNS may have evolved specifically to deal with stimulus variability and that the coupling with network states may be central to sensory processing.

Indexed as

Action PotentialsAfferent PathwaysAnimalsBehaviorHumansModels, NeurologicalNerve NetPhysical StimulationSensory Receptor Cells

Identifiers

PMID18614753
PMCPMC2544460

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.