Evidence map›Paper›PMID 18614044›Full record

ArticleMolecular cell2008

Chk2 suppresses the oncogenic potential of DNA replication-associated DNA damage.

Travis H Stracker, Suzana S Couto, Carlos Cordon-Cardo, Tulio Matos, John H J Petrini

Erratum issuedOpen access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Molecular cell, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 46 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
46citing papers in PubMed
3.4field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

46 citing papers in PubMed, 67 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Replication stress and cancer.Nature reviews. Cancer · 2015
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Ataxia-telangiectasia: future prospects.The application of clinical genetics · 2014
    Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

  • Erratum issued
5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Travis H StrackerMolecular Biology Program, Sloan-Kettering Institute, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, Cornell University Graduate School of Medical Sciences, New York, NY 10021, USA.
Suzana S Couto
Carlos Cordon-Cardo
Tulio Matos
John H J Petrini
Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center · USCornell University · US

Funding

X-RAY CRYSTALLOGRAPHYP30CA008748 · NCI · SLOAN-KETTERING INSTITUTE FOR CANCER RES · PI Nicholas D Socci · 1985 to 2026
$347.4M
ROLES OF MRELL AND RAD50 IN THE DNA DAMAGE RESPONSER01GM056888 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN MADISON · PI PETRINI, JOHN HJ · 1998 to 2019
$8.6M
The Mre11 complex: linking recombination to checkpointsR01GM059413 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN MADISON · PI PETRINI, JOHN HJ · 1999 to 2011
$5.2M
FASEB SRC on Genetic Recombination and Genome RearrangementsR13CA162528 · NCI · FEDERATION OF AMER SOC FOR EXPER BIOLOGY · PI PETRINI, JOHN HJ · 2011 to 2011
$5k
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA008748NCI NIH HHS R13 CA162528NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM056888NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM059413
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The Mre11 complex (Mre11, Rad50, and Nbs1) and Chk2 have been implicated in the DNA-damage response, an inducible process required for the suppression of malignancy. The Mre11 complex is predominantly required for repair and checkpoint activation in S phase, whereas Chk2 governs apoptosis. We examined the relationship between the Mre11 complex and Chk2 in the DNA-damage response via the establishment of Nbs1(DeltaB/DeltaB) Chk2(-/-) and Mre11(ATLD1/ATLD1) Chk2(-/-) mice. Chk2 deficiency did not modify the checkpoint defects or chromosomal instability of Mre11 complex mutants; however, the double-mutant mice exhibited synergistic defects in DNA-damage-induced p53 regulation and apoptosis. Nbs1(DeltaB/DeltaB) Chk2(-/-) and Mre11(ATLD1/ATLD1) Chk2(-/-) mice were also predisposed to tumors. In contrast, DNA-PKcs-deficient mice, in which G1-specific chromosome breaks are present, did not exhibit synergy with Chk2(-/-) mutants. These data suggest that Chk2 suppresses the oncogenic potential of DNA damage arising during S and G2 phases of the cell cycle.

Indexed as

DNA DamageDNA ReplicationAllelesAnimalsApoptosisCell CycleCell Cycle ProteinsCheckpoint Kinase 2Chromosomal InstabilityCyclin-Dependent Kinase Inhibitor p16DNA-Activated Protein KinaseDNA-Binding ProteinsDNA, ComplementaryDNA RepairDNA Repair EnzymesExonsCdkn2a protein, mouseCell Cycle ProteinsCheckpoint Kinase 2Chek2 protein, mouseCyclin-Dependent Kinase Inhibitor p16DNA-Activated Protein KinaseDNA-Binding ProteinsDNA, ComplementaryDNA Repair EnzymesMre11a protein, mouseMRE11 Homologue ProteinNijmegen breakage syndrome 1 protein, mouseNuclear ProteinsPrkdc protein, mouseProtein Serine-Threonine KinasesTumor Suppressor Protein p53

Identifiers

PMID18614044
PMCPMC2586815
OpenAlexW2002802048

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.