ArticleGenome biology2008
An en masse phenotype and function prediction system for Mus musculus.
Article in Genome biology, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
16 citing papers in PubMed.
- Integrated Deadenylase Genetic Association Network and Transcriptome Analysis in Thoracic Carcinomas.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- A holistic view of mouse enhancer architectures reveals analogous pleiotropic effects and correlation with human disease.BMC genomics · 2020Article
- Selecting causal genes from genome-wide association studies via functionally coherent subnetworks.Nature methods · 2015Article
- Novel cardiovascular gene functions revealed via systematic phenotype prediction in zebrafish.Development (Cambridge, England) · 2014Article
- Parametric Bayesian priors and better choice of negative examples improve protein function prediction.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2013Article
- Cell-type-specific predictive network yields novel insights into mouse embryonic stem cell self-renewal and cell fate.PloS one · 2013Article
- Simplified method for predicting a functional class of proteins in transcription factor complexes.PloS one · 2013Article
- Predicting the lethal phenotype of the knockout mouse by integrating comprehensive genomic data.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2012Article
- A Resource of Quantitative Functional Annotation for Homo sapiens Genes.G3 (Bethesda, Md.) · 2012Article
- Predicting genome-wide redundancy using machine learning.BMC evolutionary biology · 2010Article
- It's the machine that matters: Predicting gene function and phenotype from protein networks.Journal of proteomics · 2010Review
- Article
- FuncBase: a resource for quantitative gene function annotation.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2010Article
- Genomics Portals: integrative web-platform for mining genomics data.BMC genomics · 2010Article
- Genome-wide prioritization of disease genes and identification of disease-disease associations from an integrated human functional linkage network.Genome biology · 2009Article
- A race through the maze of genomic evidence.Genome biology · 2008Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundIndividual researchers are struggling to keep up with the accelerating emergence of high-throughput biological data, and to extract information that relates to their specific questions. Integration of accumulated evidence should permit researchers to form fewer - and more accurate - hypotheses for further study through experimentation.
resultsHere a method previously used to predict Gene Ontology (GO) terms for Saccharomyces cerevisiae (Tian et al.: Combining guilt-by-association and guilt-by-profiling to predict Saccharomyces cerevisiae gene function. Genome Biol 2008, 9(Suppl 1):S7) is applied to predict GO terms and phenotypes for 21,603 Mus musculus genes, using a diverse collection of integrated data sources (including expression, interaction, and sequence-based data). This combined 'guilt-by-profiling' and 'guilt-by-association' approach optimizes the combination of two inference methodologies. Predictions at all levels of confidence are evaluated by examining genes not used in training, and top predictions are examined manually using available literature and knowledge base resources.
conclusionWe assigned a confidence score to each gene/term combination. The results provided high prediction performance, with nearly every GO term achieving greater than 40% precision at 1% recall. Among the 36 novel predictions for GO terms and 40 for phenotypes that were studied manually, >80% and >40%, respectively, were identified as accurate. We also illustrate that a combination of 'guilt-by-profiling' and 'guilt-by-association' outperforms either approach alone in their application to M. musculus.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.