Evidence map›Paper›PMID 18613115›Full record

ReviewCytometry. Part A : the journal of the International Society for Analytical Cytology2008

Antigen-specific B cell detection reagents: use and quality control.

M Anthony Moody, Barton F Haynes

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cytometry. Part A : the journal of the International Society for Analytical Cytology, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 35% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 44 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Simultaneous analysis of antigen-specific B and T cells after SARS-CoV-2 infection and vaccination.Cytometry. Part A : the journal of the International Society for Analytical Cytology · 2022
    Article
  7. Efficient isolation of rare B cells using next-generation antigen barcoding.Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2022
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Optimisation ofWellcome open research · 2017
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Measuring antigen-specific immune responses, 2008 update.Cytometry. Part A : the journal of the International Society for Analytical Cytology · 2008
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

M Anthony MoodyDuke Human Vaccine Institute, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina 27710, USA.
Barton F Haynes
Duke Medical Center · US

Funding

Viral Sequencing CoreU19AI067854 · NIAID · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI BHARDWAJ, NINA · 2006 to 2011
$290.5M
Viral and Host Determinants of HIV-1 TransmissionU01AI067854 · NIAID · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI HAYNES, BARTON F · 2005 to 2005
$14.9M
HIV, TB, and Malaria Vaccine Development for AfricaP01AI052816 · NIAID · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI HAYNES, BARTON F · 2003 to 2007
$14.5M
Duke University Center for Translational ResearchP30AI051445 · NIAID · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI FROTHINGHAM, RICHARD · 2002 to 2006
$8.1M
NIAID NIH HHS AI051445NIAID NIH HHS AI067854NIAID NIH HHS P01 AI052816NIAID NIH HHS P30 AI051445NIAID NIH HHS U19 AI067854
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Tests for immunoglobulin reactivity with specific antigens are some of the oldest and most used assays in immunology. With efforts to understand B cell development, B cell dysregulation in autoimmunity, and to generate B cell vaccines for infectious agents, investigators have found the need to understand the ontogeny and regulation of epitope-specific B cell responses. The synchrony between surface and secreted antibodies for individual B cells has led to the development of reagents and techniques to identify antigen-specific B cells via reagent interactions with the B cell receptor complex. B cell antigen-specific reagents have been reported for model systems of haptens, for whole proteins, and for identification of double stranded (ds) DNA antibody-producing B cells using peptide mimics. Here we provide an overview of reported techniques for the detection of antigen-specific B cell responses via secreted antibody or by the surface B cell receptor and briefly discuss our recent work developing a panel of reagents to probe the B cell response to HIV-1 envelope. We also present an analysis of strengths and weaknesses of various methods for flow cytometric analysis of antigen-specific B cells.

Indexed as

AntigensB-LymphocytesEpitopesHumansIndicators and ReagentsQuality ControlReceptors, Antigen, B-CellAntigensEpitopesIndicators and ReagentsReceptors, Antigen, B-Cell

Identifiers

PMID18613115
PMCPMC3105373
OpenAlexW1595825382

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.