Evidence map›Paper›PMID 18612729›Full record

Trial reportJournal of general internal medicine2008

Adapting web-based instruction to residents' knowledge improves learning efficiency: a randomized controlled trial.

David A Cook, Thomas J Beckman, Kris G Thomas, Warren G Thompson

Registry-linked trialAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Journal of general internal medicine, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT00466453 (Adapting Web-based Instruction to Learner Baseline Knowledge), which is not on this map. Cited by 15 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT00466453 phase2 / phase3completednot on this map

Adapting Web-based Instruction to Learner Baseline Knowledge: A Randomized Controlled Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorMayo ClinicRan2005 to 2006Enrolled144ConditionsMedical Education, Medical Training, Internship and ResidencyArmsknowledge-adaptive Web-based instruction
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. E-learning for health professionals.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2018
    Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Canadian Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery clerkship curricula: evolving toward tomorrow's learners.Journal of otolaryngology - head & neck surgery = Le Journal d'oto-rhino-laryngologie et de chirurgie cervico-faciale · 2013
    Article
  12. Assessing medical students' self-regulation as aptitude in computer-based learning.Advances in health sciences education : theory and practice · 2011
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Navigating the JGIM Special Issue on Medical Education.Journal of general internal medicine · 2008
    Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

David A CookDivision of General Internal Medicine, Mayo Clinic College of Medicine, Rochester, MN, USA. cook.david33@mayo.edu
Thomas J Beckman
Kris G Thomas
Warren G Thompson

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIncreased clinical demands and decreased available time accentuate the need for efficient learning in postgraduate medical training. Adapting Web-based learning (WBL) to learners' prior knowledge may improve efficiency.

objectiveWe hypothesized that time spent learning would be shorter and test scores not adversely affected for residents who used a WBL intervention that adapted to prior knowledge.

designRandomized, crossover trial.

settingAcademic internal medicine residency program continuity clinic.

participants122 internal medicine residents.

interventionsFour WBL modules on ambulatory medicine were developed in standard and adaptive formats. The adaptive format allowed learners who correctly answered case-based questions to skip the corresponding content. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN

resultsThe measurements were knowledge posttest, time spent on modules, and format preference. One hundred twenty-two residents completed at least 1 module, and 111 completed all 4. Knowledge scores were similar between the adaptive format (mean +/- standard error of the mean, 76.2 +/- 0.9) and standard (77.2 +/- 0.9, 95% confidence interval [CI] for difference -3.0 to 1.0, P = .34). However, time spent was lower for the adaptive format (29.3 minutes [CI 26.0 to 33.0] per module) than for the standard (35.6 [31.6 to 40.3]), an 18% decrease in time (CI 9 to 26%, P = .0003). Seventy-two of 96 respondents (75%) preferred the adaptive format.

conclusionsAdapting WBL to learners' prior knowledge can reduce learning time without adversely affecting knowledge scores, suggesting greater learning efficiency. In an era where reduced duty hours and growing clinical demands on trainees and faculty limit the time available for learning, such efficiencies will be increasingly important. For clinical trial registration, see http://www.clinicaltrials.gov NCT00466453 ( http://www.clinicaltrials.gov/ct/show/NCT00466453?order=1 ).

Indexed as

Computer-Assisted InstructionInternetInternship and ResidencyFemaleHumansInternal MedicineLearningMale

Identifiers

PMID18612729
PMCPMC2517946

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.