Evidence map›Paper›PMID 18612644›Full record

ReviewPlant cell reports2008

A history of plant biotechnology: from the Cell Theory of Schleiden and Schwann to biotech crops.

Indra K Vasil

Abstract readHistorical ArticleReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Plant cell reports, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 30 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
30citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

30 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Allelochemical Potential ofPlants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Influence of the Culture Conditions onFoods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Transient recombinant expression of highly immunogenicBiotechnology reports (Amsterdam, Netherlands) · 2022
    Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Drawing on the Past to Shape the Future of Synthetic Yeast Research.International journal of molecular sciences · 2020
    Review
  12. Review
  13. A transcriptional view on somatic embryogenesis.Regeneration (Oxford, England) · 2017
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Indra K VasilUniversity of Florida, Box 110690, Gainesville, FL 32611-0690, USA. ivasil@ufl.edu

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Plant biotechnology is founded on the principles of cellular totipotency and genetic transformation, which can be traced back to the Cell Theory of Matthias Jakob Schleiden and Theodor Schwann, and the discovery of genetic transformation in bacteria by Frederick Griffith, respectively. On the 25th anniversary of the genetic transformation of plants, this review provides a historical account of the evolution of the theoretical concepts and experimental strategies that led to the production and commercialization of biotech (transformed or transgenic) plants expressing many useful genes, and emphasizes the beneficial effects of plant biotechnology on food security, human health, the environment, and conservation of biodiversity. In so doing, it celebrates and pays tribute to the contributions of scores of scientists who laid the foundation of modern plant biotechnology by their bold and unconventional thinking and experimentation. It highlights also the many important lessons to be learnt from the fascinating history of plant biotechnology, the significance of history in science teaching and research, and warns against the danger of the growing trends of ignoring history and historical illiteracy.

Indexed as

Food, Genetically ModifiedBiotechnologyCrops, AgriculturalGenetic EngineeringHistory, 19th CenturyHistory, 20th CenturyPlants, Genetically ModifiedTransformation, Genetic

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.