ArticleBone marrow transplantation2008
Therapeutic choices in patients with Ph-positive CML living in Mexico in the tyrosine kinase inhibitor era: SCT or TKIs?
Article in Bone marrow transplantation, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Impact of drug development on the use of stem cell transplantation: a report by the European Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation (EBMT).Bone marrow transplantation · 2017Article
- Haematopoietic cell transplants in Latin America.Bone marrow transplantation · 2016Review
- The role of stem cell transplantation for chronic myelogenous leukemia in the 21st century.Blood · 2015Review
- Health economics and cost-effectiveness research with special reference to hemato-oncology.Medical journal, Armed Forces India · 2013Review
- Article
- Article
- A single apheresis procedure in the donor may be enough to complete an allograft using the "Mexican method" of non-ablative allografting.Blood transfusion = Trasfusione del sangue · 2009Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
A total of 72 patients with Ph-positive CML in first chronic phase were followed during a 6-year period in two different institutions in México. Among them, 22 were given a reduced-intensity allogeneic SCT, whereas 50 were given a tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI), mainly imatinib mesylate. The 6-year overall survival (OS) after the therapeutic intervention for patients allografted or given a TKI was 77 and 84%, respectively (P, NS); the median OS for both groups has not been reached, being above 90 and 71 months, respectively (P, NS). The freedom from progression to blast or accelerated phases was also similar for both groups, as well as the overall OS after diagnosis. Most patients allografted (91%) chose this treatment because they were unable to afford continuing treatment with the TKI, whereas most treated with the TKI (84%) were given the treatment without charge, through institutions able to pay for their treatment. The median cost of each nonmyeloablative allograft was US$18,000, an amount that is enough to cover 180 days of treatment with imatinib (400 mg per day) in México. Cost considerations favor allogeneic SCT as a 'once only' procedure whereas lifelong treatment with an expensive drug represents an excessive burden on resources.
Indexed as
Identifiers
18612313What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.