Evidence map›Paper›PMID 18611844›Full record

ReviewJournal of the Royal Society, Interface2008

Biomolecular simulation and modelling: status, progress and prospects.

Marc W van der Kamp, Katherine E Shaw, Christopher J Woods, Adrian J Mulholland

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of the Royal Society, Interface, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Discovery of Novel Inhibitors ofMolecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Mathematical and computational modeling in biology at multiple scales.Theoretical biology & medical modelling · 2014
    Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Dynameomics: a comprehensive database of protein dynamics.Structure (London, England : 1993) · 2010
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Introduction. Biomolecular simulation.Journal of the Royal Society, Interface · 2008
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Marc W van der KampCentre for Computational Chemistry, School of Chemistry, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.
Katherine E Shaw
Christopher J Woods
Adrian J Mulholland

Funding

Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/D52212X/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Molecular simulation is increasingly demonstrating its practical value in the investigation of biological systems. Computational modelling of biomolecular systems is an exciting and rapidly developing area, which is expanding significantly in scope. A range of simulation methods has been developed that can be applied to study a wide variety of problems in structural biology and at the interfaces between physics, chemistry and biology. Here, we give an overview of methods and some recent developments in atomistic biomolecular simulation. Some recent applications and theoretical developments are highlighted.

Indexed as

Models, MolecularComputational BiologyComputer SimulationEnzymesMolecular BiologyQuantum TheoryEnzymes

Identifiers

PMID18611844
PMCPMC2706107

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.