ArticleBMC family practice2008
Knowledge and attitudes of primary care physicians in the management of patients at risk for cardiovascular events.
Article in BMC family practice, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03687060 (Behavioral Economics and Implementation Research to Reduce Cardiovascular Risk in HIV-Infected Adults), which is not on this map. Cited by 45 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Behavioral Economics and Implementation Research to Reduce Cardiovascular Risk in HIV-Infected Adults
Who cites it
45 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Effectiveness-based guidelines for the prevention of cardiovascular disease in women--2011 update: a guideline from the american heart association.Circulation · 2011Guideline
- Effectiveness-based guidelines for the prevention of cardiovascular disease in women--2011 update: a guideline from the American Heart Association.Journal of the American College of Cardiology · 2011Guideline
- Reduction of cardiovascular risk factors among young men with hypertension using an interactive decision aid: cluster-randomized control trial.BMC cardiovascular disorders · 2021Trial
- Efficacy of a strategy for implementing a guideline for the control of cardiovascular risk in a primary healthcare setting: the SIRVA2 study a controlled, blinded community intervention trial randomised by clusters.BMC family practice · 2011Trial
- The RISAP-study: a complex intervention in risk communication and shared decision-making in general practice.BMC family practice · 2010Trial
- Guideline adherence for the management of cardiovascular disease in primary care: a scoping review.Family practice · 2026Article
- Physician Education and Peer Comparisons to Reduce Cardiovascular Risk Among People Living with HIV: A Stepped-Wedge Cluster Randomized Trial.AIDS and behavior · 2026Article
- Defining quality indicators for atherosclerotic cardiovascular diseases in primary care, extractable from the electronic health record: a RAND-modified Delphi method.BMC primary care · 2025Article
- Shift in therapeutic approaches in patients with hypercholesterolemia - a secondary data analysis.BMC primary care · 2025Article
- Knowledge of risk factors of heart disease among medical students and interns: A cross-sectional study from King Khalid University, Saudi Arabia.Journal of family medicine and primary care · 2025Article
- Kidney Transplantation Contraindications: Variation in Nephrologist Practice and Training Vintage.Kidney international reports · 2024Article
- 'Primary health care research & development · 2023Article
- Non-acute chest pain in primary care; referral rates, communication and guideline adherence: a cohort study using routinely collected health data.BMC primary care · 2022Article
- "Patients would probably be more compliant to therapy if encouraged by those around them": a qualitative study exploring primary care physicians' perceptions on barriers to CVD risk management.BMC primary care · 2022Article
- Experience of Patients with Diabetes and Other Cardiovascular Risk Factors with Health Professionals and Healthcare in Spain.Journal of clinical medicine · 2021Article
- Anthocyanin-rich fraction from Thai berries interferes with the key steps of lipid digestion and cholesterol absorption.Heliyon · 2020Article
- Assessment of care provision for hypertension at the emergency Department of an Urban Hospital in Mozambique.BMC health services research · 2019Article
- Nationwide Epidemiological Study of Knowledge, Attitudes, and Practices Study of Greek General Practitioners Related to Screening.International journal of preventive medicine · 2019Article
- Understanding Primary Care Provider Attitudes and Behaviors Regarding Cardiovascular Disease Risk and Diabetes Prevention in the Northern Midwest.Clinical diabetes : a publication of the American Diabetes Association · 2018Article
- Awareness and knowledge of cardiovascular disease risk factors among medical students.Wiener klinische Wochenschrift · 2017Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundAdherence to clinical practice guidelines for management of cardiovascular disease (CVD) is suboptimal. The purposes of this study were to identify practice patterns and barriers among U.S. general internists and family physicians in regard to cardiovascular risk management, and examine the association between physician characteristics and cardiovascular risk management.
methodsA case vignette survey focused on cardiovascular disease risk management was distributed to a random sample of 12,000 U.S. family physicians and general internists between November and December 2006.
resultsResponses from a total of 888 practicing primary care physicians who see 60 patients per week were used for analysis. In an asymptomatic patient at low risk for cardiovascular event, 28% of family physicians and 37% of general internists made guideline-based preventive choices for no antiplatelet therapy (p < .01). In a patient at high risk for cardiovascular event, 59% of family physicians and 56% of general internists identified the guideline-based goal for serum fasting LDL level (< 100 mg/dl). Guideline adherence was inversely related to years in practice and volume of patients seen. Cost of medications (87.7%), adherence to medications (74.1%), adequate time for counseling (55.7%), patient education tools (47.1%), knowledge and skills to recommend dietary changes (47.8%) and facilitate patient adherence (52.0%) were cited as significant barriers to CVD risk management.
conclusionDespite the benefits demonstrated for managing cardiovascular risks, gaps remain in primary care practitioners' management of risks according to guideline recommendations. Innovative educational approaches that address barriers may facilitate the implementation of guideline-based recommendations in CVD risk management.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.