Evidence map›Paper›PMID 18609713›Full record

ArticleWorld journal of gastroenterology2008

Measurement of circulating levels of VEGF-A, -C, and -D and their receptors, VEGFR-1 and -2 in gastric adenocarcinoma.

Mansour-S Al-Moundhri, A Al-Shukaili, M Al-Nabhani, B Al-Bahrani, I-A Burney, A Rizivi, S-S Ganguly

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in World journal of gastroenterology, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
2.8field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 40 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. ACS medicinal chemistry letters · 2017
    Article
  6. Correlations between VEGF-A expression and prognosis in patients with gastric adenocarcinoma.International journal of clinical and experimental pathology · 2017
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Serum vascular endothelial growth factors C and D as forecast tools for patients with gallbladder carcinoma.Tumour biology : the journal of the International Society for Oncodevelopmental Biology and Medicine · 2015
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Mansour-S Al-MoundhriMedical Oncology Unit, Department of Medicine, College of Medicine and Health Sciences, Sultan Qaboos University, Muscat, Oman. mansours@squ.edu.om
A Al-Shukaili
M Al-Nabhani
B Al-Bahrani
I-A Burney
A Rizivi
S-S Ganguly
Sultan Qaboos University · OMRoyal Hospital · OMSultan Qaboos University Hospital · OM

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimTo analyze the serum levels and prognostic significance of vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) -A, -C, and -D, and their receptors, VEGFR-1 and -2 in gastric adenocarcinomas.

methodsThe serum levels of VEGF family members were measured in 76 control subjects and 76 patients with gastric adenocarcinoma using an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). These measurements were correlated with clinco-pathological features and survival rates.

resultsThe serum levels of VEGF-A and its receptor, VEGFR-1, were significantly higher in patients with gastric cancer than in healthy donors (t = 2.3, P = 0.02 and t = 4.2, P < 0.0001, respectively). In contrast, the serum levels of VEGF-D were significantly higher in control subjects than in patients (t = 2.9, P = 0.004). There was no significant difference in serum levels of VEGF-C and VEGFR-2 between patients and controls. VEGF-C was associated with advanced tumor stage and presence of metastasis. VEGFR-1 was associated with metastasis, advanced overall stage, tumor differentiation and survival. VEGFR-2 levels were associated with poor tumor differentiation. There was no significant prognostic value for any of the VEGF family members or their receptors except for VEGFR-1 where high levels were associated with a poor overall survival.

conclusionSerum VEGF levels vary significantly in the same cohort of patients with variable clinico-pathological features and prognostic values. The simultaneous measurement of VEGF receptors levels in sera may overcome the limitations of a single biomarker assay.

Indexed as

AdenocarcinomaAdultAgedAged, 80 and overBiomarkers, TumorCase-Control StudiesFemaleHumansKaplan-Meier EstimateMaleMiddle AgedPredictive Value of TestsPrognosisStomach NeoplasmsVascular Endothelial Growth Factor AVascular Endothelial Growth Factor CBiomarkers, TumorVascular Endothelial Growth Factor AVascular Endothelial Growth Factor CVascular Endothelial Growth Factor DVascular Endothelial Growth Factor Receptor-1Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor Receptor-2

Identifiers

PMID18609713
PMCPMC2721446
OpenAlexW2000280067

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.