Evidence map›Paper›PMID 18607311›Full record

Trial reportSexually transmitted diseases2008

The influence of depression on sexual risk reduction and STD infection in a controlled, randomized intervention trial.

Alan E C Holden, Rochelle N Shain, Warren B Miller, Jeanna M Piper, Sondra T Perdue, Andrea R Thurman, Jeffrey E Korte

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Sexually transmitted diseases, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Alan E C HoldenDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Texas Health Science Center, 7703 Floyd Curl Drive, San Antonio, TX 78229-3900, USA. holden@uthscsa.edu
Rochelle N Shain
Warren B Miller
Jeanna M Piper
Sondra T Perdue
Andrea R Thurman
Jeffrey E Korte

Funding

San Antonio STI TM CRCU19AI045429 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS HLTH SCIENCE CENTER · PI BASEMAN, JOEL BARRY · 1999 to 2010
$13.9M
NIAID NIH HHS 1 U19 AI 45429-01NIAID NIH HHS 5 U19 AI 45429-05NIAID NIH HHS U19 AI045429
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundA randomized controlled trial of SAFE, a cognitive/behavioral intervention, revealed that it significantly reduces reinfection and behavioral risks among participants compared with controls. However, studies suggest that depression may moderate intervention efficacy among affected persons because of impaired information processing, failure to recognize risk, or inability to change behavior. GOAL: We evaluated SAFE efficacy among depressed and nondepressed Mexican- and African American women after comparing initial risk factors by depression status. We further explored intervention effects in moderately and severely depressed women. STUDY

designWe stratified 477 participants (249 intervention, 228 controls) according to their depression status at baseline determined by CES-D scores. Using chi and multivariate logistic regression, we evaluated differences in reinfection and behavioral risk at 6-month, 12-month, and 1-year cumulative follow-ups between groups within baseline depression strata.

results: At baseline, 74.4% of women were depressed and had significantly greater levels of behavioral risks than nondepressed women. At follow-up intervals, behavioral risks and reinfection rates were lower among intervention women compared with controls regardless of depression status. For example, at 1-year follow-up reinfection rates were 15.2% in nondepressed intervention women versus 21.4% in nondepressed controls (AOR = 0.6), and 18.6% in depressed intervention women versus 27.3% in depressed controls (AOR = 0.6). Moreover, reinfection was consistently lower among moderately and severely depressed intervention women than controls (moderately depressed: 19.3% vs. 27.2%, AOR = 0.6; severely depressed: 17.9% vs. 27.5%, AOR = 0.6).

conclusionsDespite significantly greater behavioral risk among depressed women at baseline, SAFE was equally successful in reducing reinfection and high-risk behavior among depressed and nondepressed participants.

Indexed as

Risk Reduction BehaviorSexual BehaviorAdolescentAdultBehavior TherapyBlack or African AmericanChlamydia InfectionsChlamydia trachomatisDepressionFemaleHumansMexican AmericansMiddle AgedSexually Transmitted Diseases

Identifiers

PMID18607311
PMCPMC2767174

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.