Evidence map›Paper›PMID 18604600›Full record

ArticlePsychopharmacology2009

Dopamine D4 receptor involvement in the discriminative stimulus effects in rats of LSD, but not the phenethylamine hallucinogen DOI.

Danuta Marona-Lewicka, Benjamin R Chemel, David E Nichols

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Psychopharmacology, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed
2.4field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 42 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Direct comparison of the acute effects of lysergic acid diethylamide and psilocybin in a double-blind placebo-controlled study in healthy subjects.Neuropsychopharmacology : official publication of the American College of Neuropsychopharmacology · 2022
    Trial
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Psychedelic therapies reconsidered: compounds, clinical indications, and cautious optimism.Neuropsychopharmacology : official publication of the American College of Neuropsychopharmacology · 2024
    Review
  6. Review
  7. The neural basis of psychedelic action.Nature neuroscience · 2022
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Psychedelics.Pharmacological reviews · 2016
    Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Danuta Marona-LewickaDepartment of Medicinal Chemistry and Molecular Pharmacology, School of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences-RHPH, Purdue University, 575 Stadium Mall Dr., West Lafayette, IN 47907-2091, USA.
Benjamin R Chemel
David E Nichols
Purdue University West Lafayette · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

rationaleLysergic acid diethylamide (LSD) differs from other types of hallucinogens in that it possesses direct dopaminergic effects. The exact nature of this component has not been elucidated.

objectiveThe present study sought to characterize the effects of several dopamine D(4) agonists and antagonists on the discriminative stimulus effect of LSD at two pretreatment times and 2,5-dimethoxy-4-iodoamphetamine (DOI), a selective 5-HT(2A/2C) agonist. MATERIALS AND

methodsMale Sprague-Dawley rats were trained in a two-lever, fixed ratio (FR) 50, food-reinforced task with LSD-30 (0.08 mg/kg, i.p., 30-min pretreatment time), LSD-90 (0.16 mg/kg, i.p., 90-min pretreatment time), and DOI (0.4 mg/kg, i.p., 30-min pretreatment time) as discriminative stimuli. Substitution and combination tests with the dopamine D(4) agonists, ABT-724 and WAY 100635, were performed in all groups. Combination tests were run using the dopamine D(4) antagonists A-381393 and L-745,870 and two antipsychotic drugs, clozapine and olanzapine.

resultsWAY 100635 produced full substitution in LSD-90 rats, partial substitution in LSD-30 rats, and saline appropriate responding in DOI-trained rats. ABT-724 partially mimicked the LSD-90 and LSD-30 cues, but produced no substitution in DOI-trained rats. In combination tests, both agonists shifted the dose-response curve of LSD leftward, most potently for the LSD-90 cue. The D(4) antagonists significantly attenuated both the LSD-90 and LSD-30 cue, but had no effect on the DOI cue.

conclusionDopamine D(4) receptor activation plays a significant modulatory role in the discriminative stimulus effects in LSD-90-trained rats, most markedly for the later temporal phase of LSD, but has no effect on the cue produced by DOI.

Indexed as

AmphetaminesAnimalsBenzimidazolesBinding, CompetitiveCell LineCyclic AMPDiscrimination, PsychologicalDose-Response Relationship, DrugHallucinogensHumansLysergic Acid DiethylamideMalePiperazinesPyridinesRadioligand AssayRats4-iodo-2,5-dimethoxyphenylisopropylamineABT724AmphetaminesBenzimidazolesCyclic AMPHallucinogensLysergic Acid DiethylamideN-(2-(4-(2-methoxyphenyl)-1-piperazinyl)ethyl)-N-(2-pyridinyl)cyclohexanecarboxamidePiperazinesPyridinesReceptors, Dopamine D4

Identifiers

PMID18604600
OpenAlexW2093210784

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.